[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALHoRjcwnHGWKDLD_RO5W2yDSTBbmPUq+eEczk7v5FjuhKikLw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 09:54:29 -0800
From: Steve Williams <steve.williams@...cruise.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net-next] sandlan: Add the sandlan virtual
network interface
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 12:09 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 06:59:11PM -0800, Steve Williams wrote:
> > I have had trouble with the veth driver not transparently passing the
> > full ethernet packets unaltered, and this is wreaking havoc with the
> > hanic driver that I have (and that I'm submitting separately). That,
> > and veth nodes only come in pairs, whereas with sandlan I can make
> > more complex LANs and that allows me to emulate more complex
> > situations. But fair point, and I am looking more closely at figuring
> > out exactly what the veth driver is doing to my packets.
>
> If there is a real problem with veth, please describe it, so we can
> fix the bugs. We don't add new emulators because of bugs in the
> existing system.
In light of the feedback I received here, I revisited the issue; and
was able to get the veth driver to work after all, at least for
regression tests of the hanic driver. I can't seem to reproduce the
issue I thought I was having. So that kills one motivation for the
sandlan driver, at least for me.
--
Stephen Williams
Senior Software Engineer
Cruise
--
*Confidentiality Note:* We care about protecting our proprietary
information, confidential material, and trade secrets. This message may
contain some or all of those things. Cruise will suffer material harm if
anyone other than the intended recipient disseminates or takes any action
based on this message. If you have received this message (including any
attachments) in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender
promptly.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists