lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ8uoz1RjaGv=HEwmaZw1hKH_GpHA9u-sBvz-Cxb0W_wdYjDZg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 7 Dec 2022 16:37:27 +0100
From:   Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>
To:     "Rout, ChandanX" <chandanx.rout@...el.com>
Cc:     "Lobakin, Alexandr" <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
        "Fijalkowski, Maciej" <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
        "Sarkar, Tirthendu" <tirthendu.sarkar@...el.com>,
        "tirtha@...il.com" <tirtha@...il.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Karlsson, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
        "Kuruvinakunnel, George" <george.kuruvinakunnel@...el.com>,
        "Nagaraju, Shwetha" <shwetha.nagaraju@...el.com>,
        "Nagraj, Shravan" <shravan.nagraj@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH intel-next v4] i40e: allow toggling
 loopback mode via ndo_set_features callback

On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 4:01 PM Rout, ChandanX <chandanx.rout@...el.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Team,
> We observed some different result on i40e driver which are as follows
>
> Issue Summary: Unable to find loopback test in "ethtool -t <interface> using i40e driver using latest next-queue.
> Observations:
> ===========
> 1. we are able to enable loopback mode on i40e driver.
> 2. We are unable to find loopback test in "ethtool -t <interface>" command while using i40e driver.

That is correct, there is no loopback test in i40e. We chose not to
add one since it was broken in ice (until Maciej fixed it), so we
thought nobody actually used it. Instead, we have a much more thorough
test shipped in tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xsk* that tests the
loopback support in more ways than just sending a single message. I
have run this test using Tirtha's patch and it passes. So can I sign
off with a Tested-by? Would save you a lot of time, which is good.
There is no point for you to run the same test as I did again. Just a
waste of valuable testing time.

> 3. However, in ice driver we are able to enable loopback mode also we are able to see the loopback test using "ethtool -t <interface>".
>
> Note: Detail Observation is attached in excel format.
>
> On I40e
> =======
> [root@...alhost admin]# ethtool -k ens802f3 | grep loopback
> loopback: off
> [root@...alhost admin]# ethtool -K ens802f3 loopback on
> [root@...alhost admin]# ethtool -k ens802f3 | grep loopback
> loopback: on
> [root@...alhost admin]# ethtool -t ens802f3 online
> The test result is PASS
> The test extra info:
> Register test  (offline)         0
> Eeprom test    (offline)         0
> Interrupt test (offline)         0
> Link test   (on/offline)         0
> [root@...alhost admin]# ethtool -t ens802f3 offline
> The test result is PASS
> The test extra info:
> Register test  (offline)         0
> Eeprom test    (offline)         0
> Interrupt test (offline)         0
> Link test   (on/offline)         0
>
> On ice
> =====
> [root@...alhost admin]# ethtool -k ens801f0np0 | grep loopback
> loopback: off
> [root@...alhost admin]# ethtool -K ens801f0np0 loopback on
> [root@...alhost admin]# ethtool -k ens801f0np0 | grep loopback
> loopback: on
> [root@...alhost admin]# ethtool -t ens801f0np0 online
> The test result is PASS
> The test extra info:
> Register test  (offline)         0
> EEPROM test    (offline)         0
> Interrupt test (offline)         0
> Loopback test  (offline)         0
> Link test   (on/offline)         0
> [root@...alhost admin]# ethtool -t ens801f0np0 offline
> The test result is PASS
> The test extra info:
> Register test  (offline)         0
> EEPROM test    (offline)         0
> Interrupt test (offline)         0
> Loopback test  (offline)         0
> Link test   (on/offline)         0
>
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Chandan Kumar Rout
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@...osl.org> On Behalf Of Lobakin, Alexandr
> Sent: 22 November 2022 21:28
> To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
> Cc: Sarkar, Tirthendu <tirthendu.sarkar@...el.com>; tirtha@...il.com; intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; Karlsson, Magnus <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>
> Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH intel-next v4] i40e: allow toggling loopback mode via ndo_set_features callback
>
> From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 13:07:28 +0200
>
> > On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 02:33:06PM +0530, Tirthendu Sarkar wrote:
> > > Add support for NETIF_F_LOOPBACK. This feature can be set via:
> > > $ ethtool -K eth0 loopback <on|off>
> > >
> > > This sets the MAC Tx->Rx loopback.
> > >
> > > This feature is used for the xsk selftests, and might have other
> > > uses too.
>
> [...]
>
> > > @@ -12960,6 +12983,9 @@ static int i40e_set_features(struct net_device *netdev,
> > >     if (need_reset)
> > >             i40e_do_reset(pf, I40E_PF_RESET_FLAG, true);
> > >
> > > +   if ((features ^ netdev->features) & NETIF_F_LOOPBACK)
> > > +           return i40e_set_loopback(vsi, !!(features & NETIF_F_LOOPBACK));
> >
> > Don't you need to disable loopback if NETIF_F_LOOPBACK was cleared?
>
> 0 ^ 1 == 1 -> call i40e_set_loopback()
> !!(0) == 0 -> disable
>
> >
> > > +
> > >     return 0;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > @@ -13722,7 +13748,7 @@ static int i40e_config_netdev(struct i40e_vsi *vsi)
> > >     if (!(pf->flags & I40E_FLAG_MFP_ENABLED))
> > >             hw_features |= NETIF_F_NTUPLE | NETIF_F_HW_TC;
> > >
> > > -   netdev->hw_features |= hw_features;
> > > +   netdev->hw_features |= hw_features | NETIF_F_LOOPBACK;
> > >
>
> Reviewed-by: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>
>
> Thanks,
> Olek
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-wired-lan mailing list
> Intel-wired-lan@...osl.org
> https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ