netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] net: lan966x: Add ptp trap rules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 9 Dec 2022 15:20:58 +0100
From:   Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
To:     Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
CC:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>, <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
        <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
        <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <pabeni@...hat.com>, <richardcochran@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] net: lan966x: Add ptp trap rules

The 12/09/2022 15:05, Michael Walle wrote:
> 
> Am 2022-12-09 13:56, schrieb Vladimir Oltean:
> > On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 01:58:57PM +0100, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> > > > Does it also work out of the box with the following patch if
> > > > the interface is part of a bridge or do you still have to do
> > > > the tc magic from above?
> > > 
> > > You will still need to enable the TCAM using the tc command to have it
> > > working when the interface is part of the bridge.
> > 
> > FWIW, with ocelot (same VCAP mechanism), PTP traps work out of the box,
> > no need to use tc. Same goes for ocelot-8021q, which also uses the
> > VCAP.
> > I wouldn't consider forcing the user to add any tc command in order for
> > packet timestamping to work properly.

On ocelot, the vcap is enabled at port initialization, while on other
platforms(lan966x and sparx5) you have the option to enable or disable.

> 
> +1
> Esp. because there is no warning. I.e. I tried this patch while
> the interface was added on a bridge and there was no error
> whatsoever.

What error/warning were you expecting to see here?

> Also, you'd force the user to have that Kconfig option
> set.



> 
> -michael
> 

-- 
/Horatiu