[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <229be448e2979258a7c2c84d808360618f5095a9.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 19:21:14 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] epoll: use refcount to reduce ep_mutex contention
Hi,
On Mon, 2022-12-12 at 22:01 -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> I am trying to understand whether this patch is correct.
>
> One thing that would help would be to use more standard naming:
>
> ep_put => ep_refcount_dec_and_test (or ep_put_and_test)
> ep_dispose => ep_free
> ep_free => ep_clear_and_put
Thank you for the feedback.
I must admit I'm not good at all at selecting good names, so I
definitelly will apply the above. I additionally still have to cover
the feedback from Jacob - switching the reference count to a kref - as
I've been diverted to other tasks.
I hope to be able to share a new revision of this patch next week.
Thanks,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists