lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20221212193447.0a69325e@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 19:34:47 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> To: Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>, Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>, Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>, Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>, Clément Léger <clement.leger@...tlin.com>, Alvin Šipraga <alsi@...g-olufsen.dk>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 00/10] dt-binding preparation for ocelot switches On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 11:03:09 -0800 Colin Foster wrote: > > A lot of carried over review tags here, so please let me know if > > there's anything that needs to be reviewed here, otherwise I'd like > > to merge the series for 6.2 by the end of the day. > > I just responded to patch 4, which has a small (?) outstanding issue / > discussion. I asked Rob and Arınç's opinions as to whether it should > hold up this series. Everything else is good to go, as far as I > understand. No reply :( Since this is "just" DT bindings (as in shouldn't functionally break anything) - if Rob gives us a green light we can still pull it into the mid-merge window follow up. But I'll drop it from pw for now so it doesn't distract us.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists