[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1670902391.9610498-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 11:33:11 +0800
From: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] virtio-net: correctly enable callback during start_xmit
On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 04:25:22 -0500, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 05:10:29PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > Commit a7766ef18b33("virtio_net: disable cb aggressively") enables
> > virtqueue callback via the following statement:
> >
> > do {
> > ......
> > } while (use_napi && kick &&
> > unlikely(!virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(sq->vq)));
> >
> > This will cause a missing call to virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed() when
> > kick is false. Fixing this by removing the checking of the kick from
> > the condition to make sure callback is enabled correctly.
> >
> > Fixes: a7766ef18b33 ("virtio_net: disable cb aggressively")
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > The patch is needed for -stable.
>
> stable rules don't allow for theoretical fixes. Was a problem observed?
>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > index 86e52454b5b5..44d7daf0267b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > @@ -1834,8 +1834,8 @@ static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> >
> > free_old_xmit_skbs(sq, false);
> >
> > - } while (use_napi && kick &&
> > - unlikely(!virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(sq->vq)));
> > + } while (use_napi &&
> > + unlikely(!virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(sq->vq)));
> >
>
> A bit more explanation pls. kick simply means !netdev_xmit_more -
> if it's false we know there will be another packet, then transmissing
> that packet will invoke virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed. No?
It's just that there may be a next packet, but in fact there may not be.
For example, the vq is full, and the driver stops the queue.
Thanks.
>
>
>
>
>
> > /* timestamp packet in software */
> > skb_tx_timestamp(skb);
> > --
> > 2.25.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Virtualization mailing list
> Virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
Powered by blists - more mailing lists