netdev - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/106] 5.10.159-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <86c7e7a5-6457-49c5-a9e3-b28b8b8c1134@app.fastmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 13 Dec 2022 10:20:30 +0100
From:   "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To:     "Naresh Kamboju" <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
        "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Guenter Roeck" <linux@...ck-us.net>, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        "Pavel Machek" <pavel@...x.de>,
        "Jon Hunter" <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        "Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "Sudip Mukherjee" <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
        "Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "Anders Roxell" <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/106] 5.10.159-rc1 review

On Tue, Dec 13, 2022, at 08:48, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 at 18:43, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> Regression detected on arm64 Raspberry Pi 4 Model B the NFS mount failed.
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
>
> Following changes have been noticed in the Kconfig file between good and bad.
> The config files attached to this email.
>
> -CONFIG_BCMGENET=y
> -CONFIG_BROADCOM_PHY=y
> +# CONFIG_BROADCOM_PHY is not set
> -CONFIG_BCM7XXX_PHY=y
> +# CONFIG_BCM7XXX_PHY is not set
> -CONFIG_BCM_NET_PHYLIB=y

> Full test log details,
>  - https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/5946533#L392
>  - 
> https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.158-107-gd2432186ff47/testrun/13594402/suite/log-parser-test/tests/
>  - 
> https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.158-107-gd2432186ff47/testrun/13594402/suite/log-parser-test/test/check-kernel-panic/history/

Where does the kernel configuration come from? Is this
a plain defconfig that used to work, or do you have
a board specific config file?

This is most likely caused by the added dependency on
CONFIG_PTP_1588_CLOCK that would lead to the BCMGENET
driver not being built-in if PTP support is in a module.

     Arnd