Message-ID: <CA+HBbNFCFtJwzN=6SCsWnDmAjPkmxE4guH1RrLc+-HByLcVVXA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Dec 2022 13:02:42 +0100
From:   Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
Cc:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
        Robert Marko <robimarko@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, elder@...aro.org,
        hemantk@...eaurora.org, quic_jhugo@...cinc.com,
        quic_qianyu@...cinc.com, bbhatt@...eaurora.org,
        mhi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        ath11k@...ts.infradead.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, ansuelsmth@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] wifi: ath11k: use unique QRTR instance ID

On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 12:26 PM Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org> writes:
>
> > Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org> writes:
> >
> >> On Sat, Nov 05, 2022 at 08:49:43PM +0100, Robert Marko wrote:
> >>> Currently, trying to use AHB + PCI/MHI cards or multiple PCI/MHI cards
> >>> will cause a clash in the QRTR instance node ID and prevent the driver
> >>> from talking via QMI to the card and thus initializing it with:
> >>> [    9.836329] ath11k c000000.wifi: host capability request failed: 1 90
> >>> [    9.842047] ath11k c000000.wifi: failed to send qmi host cap: -22
> >>>
> >>
> >> There is still an outstanding issue where you cannot connect two WLAN modules
> >> with same node id.
> >>
> >>> So, in order to allow for this combination of cards, especially AHB + PCI
> >>> cards like IPQ8074 + QCN9074 (Used by me and tested on) set the desired
> >>> QRTR instance ID offset by calculating a unique one based on PCI domain
> >>> and bus ID-s and writing it to bits 7-0 of BHI_ERRDBG2 MHI register by
> >>> using the SBL state callback that is added as part of the series.
> >>> We also have to make sure that new QRTR offset is added on top of the
> >>> default QRTR instance ID-s that are currently used in the driver.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Register BHI_ERRDBG2 is listed as Read only from Host as per the BHI spec.
> >> So I'm not sure if this solution is going to work on all ath11k supported
> >> chipsets.
> >>
> >> Kalle, can you confirm?
> >
> > I can't look at this in detail right now, but hopefully in few days.
> > I'll get back to you.
>
> The solution we have been thinking internally would not use
> MHI_CB_EE_SBL_MODE at all, it's not clear for me yet why the mode was
> not needed in our solution. Maybe there are firmware modifications? I
> think it's best that we submit our proposal as well, then we can then
> compare implementations and see what is the best course of action.

Kalle, any ETA when you will post your idea?
I am constantly hitting this crazy limitation and my idea does not work on cards
like QCA6390 so it's not a viable workaround at all.

Regards,
Robert
>
> But it looks that not all ath11k hardware and firmware releases support
> this feature, we would need meta data information from the firmware to
> detect it. I am working on adding firmware meta data support[1] to
> ath11k, will post patches for that "soon".
>
> [1] similar to firmware-N.bin support ath10k has
>
> --
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
>
> https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
>
> --
> ath11k mailing list
> ath11k@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath11k



-- 
Robert Marko
Staff Embedded Linux Engineer
Sartura Ltd.
Lendavska ulica 16a
10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Email: robert.marko@...tura.hr
Web: www.sartura.hr

Powered by blists - more mailing lists