[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ8uoz25MkczfwKKR3_TZb56f6ZqMPEy6ZFSr0JZFNui7AtXvw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 11:53:43 +0100
From: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>
To: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
Cc: magnus.karlsson@...el.com, bjorn@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
yhs@...com, andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev,
song@...nel.org, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...gle.com, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
jonathan.lemon@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 13/15] selftests/xsk: merge dual and single
thread dispatchers
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 5:12 PM Maciej Fijalkowski
<maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 10:08:24AM +0100, Magnus Karlsson wrote:
> > From: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>
> >
> > Make the thread dispatching code common by unifying the dual and
> > single thread dispatcher code. This so we do not have to add code in
> > two places in upcoming commits.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>
> > ---
> > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c | 120 ++++++++++-------------
> > 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
> > index 522dc1d69c17..0457874c0995 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
> > @@ -1364,85 +1364,61 @@ static void handler(int signum)
> > pthread_exit(NULL);
> > }
> >
> > -static int testapp_validate_traffic_single_thread(struct test_spec *test, struct ifobject *ifobj,
> > - enum test_type type)
> > +static int __testapp_validate_traffic(struct test_spec *test, struct ifobject *ifobj_rx,
> > + struct ifobject *ifobj_tx)
> > {
> > - bool old_shared_umem = ifobj->shared_umem;
> > - pthread_t t0;
> > -
> > - if (pthread_barrier_init(&barr, NULL, 2))
> > - exit_with_error(errno);
> > -
> > - test->current_step++;
> > - if (type == TEST_TYPE_POLL_RXQ_TMOUT)
> > - pkt_stream_reset(ifobj->pkt_stream);
> > - pkts_in_flight = 0;
> > -
> > - test->ifobj_rx->shared_umem = false;
> > - test->ifobj_tx->shared_umem = false;
> > -
> > - signal(SIGUSR1, handler);
> > - /* Spawn thread */
> > - pthread_create(&t0, NULL, ifobj->func_ptr, test);
> > -
> > - if (type != TEST_TYPE_POLL_TXQ_TMOUT)
> > - pthread_barrier_wait(&barr);
> > -
> > - if (pthread_barrier_destroy(&barr))
> > - exit_with_error(errno);
> > -
> > - pthread_kill(t0, SIGUSR1);
> > - pthread_join(t0, NULL);
> > -
> > - if (test->total_steps == test->current_step || test->fail) {
> > - xsk_socket__delete(ifobj->xsk->xsk);
> > - xsk_clear_xskmap(ifobj->xskmap);
> > - testapp_clean_xsk_umem(ifobj);
> > - }
> > -
> > - test->ifobj_rx->shared_umem = old_shared_umem;
> > - test->ifobj_tx->shared_umem = old_shared_umem;
> > -
> > - return !!test->fail;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static int testapp_validate_traffic(struct test_spec *test)
> > -{
> > - struct ifobject *ifobj_tx = test->ifobj_tx;
> > - struct ifobject *ifobj_rx = test->ifobj_rx;
> > pthread_t t0, t1;
> >
> > - if (pthread_barrier_init(&barr, NULL, 2))
> > - exit_with_error(errno);
> > + if (ifobj_tx)
> > + if (pthread_barrier_init(&barr, NULL, 2))
> > + exit_with_error(errno);
> >
> > test->current_step++;
> > pkt_stream_reset(ifobj_rx->pkt_stream);
> > pkts_in_flight = 0;
> >
> > + signal(SIGUSR1, handler);
> > /*Spawn RX thread */
> > pthread_create(&t0, NULL, ifobj_rx->func_ptr, test);
> >
> > - pthread_barrier_wait(&barr);
> > - if (pthread_barrier_destroy(&barr))
> > - exit_with_error(errno);
> > + if (ifobj_tx) {
> > + pthread_barrier_wait(&barr);
> > + if (pthread_barrier_destroy(&barr))
> > + exit_with_error(errno);
> >
> > - /*Spawn TX thread */
> > - pthread_create(&t1, NULL, ifobj_tx->func_ptr, test);
> > + /*Spawn TX thread */
> > + pthread_create(&t1, NULL, ifobj_tx->func_ptr, test);
> >
> > - pthread_join(t1, NULL);
> > - pthread_join(t0, NULL);
> > + pthread_join(t1, NULL);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!ifobj_tx)
> > + pthread_kill(t0, SIGUSR1);
> > + else
> > + pthread_join(t0, NULL);
> >
> > if (test->total_steps == test->current_step || test->fail) {
> > - xsk_socket__delete(ifobj_tx->xsk->xsk);
> > + if (ifobj_tx)
> > + xsk_socket__delete(ifobj_tx->xsk->xsk);
> > xsk_socket__delete(ifobj_rx->xsk->xsk);
> > testapp_clean_xsk_umem(ifobj_rx);
> > - if (!ifobj_tx->shared_umem)
> > + if (ifobj_tx && !ifobj_tx->shared_umem)
> > testapp_clean_xsk_umem(ifobj_tx);
> > }
> >
> > return !!test->fail;
> > }
> >
> > +static int testapp_validate_traffic(struct test_spec *test)
> > +{
> > + return __testapp_validate_traffic(test, test->ifobj_rx, test->ifobj_tx);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int testapp_validate_traffic_single_thread(struct test_spec *test, struct ifobject *ifobj)
> > +{
> > + return __testapp_validate_traffic(test, ifobj, NULL);
>
> One minor comment here is that for single thread we either spawn Rx or Tx
> thread, whereas reading the code one could tell that single threaded test
> works only on Rx.
>
> Maybe rename to ifobj1 ifobj2 from ifobj_rx ifobj_rx? everything within is
> generic, like, we have func_ptr, not tx_func_ptr, so this won't look odd
> with ifobj1 as a name.
Makes sense. Will do this.
> > +}
> > +
> > static void testapp_teardown(struct test_spec *test)
> > {
> > int i;
> > @@ -1684,6 +1660,26 @@ static void testapp_xdp_drop(struct test_spec *test)
> > ifobj->xskmap = ifobj->def_prog->maps.xsk;
> > }
> >
> > +static void testapp_poll_txq_tmout(struct test_spec *test)
> > +{
> > + test_spec_set_name(test, "POLL_TXQ_FULL");
> > +
> > + test->ifobj_tx->use_poll = true;
> > + /* create invalid frame by set umem frame_size and pkt length equal to 2048 */
> > + test->ifobj_tx->umem->frame_size = 2048;
> > + pkt_stream_replace(test, 2 * DEFAULT_PKT_CNT, 2048);
> > + testapp_validate_traffic_single_thread(test, test->ifobj_tx);
> > +
> > + pkt_stream_restore_default(test);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void testapp_poll_rxq_tmout(struct test_spec *test)
> > +{
> > + test_spec_set_name(test, "POLL_RXQ_EMPTY");
> > + test->ifobj_rx->use_poll = true;
> > + testapp_validate_traffic_single_thread(test, test->ifobj_rx);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int xsk_load_xdp_programs(struct ifobject *ifobj)
> > {
> > ifobj->def_prog = xsk_def_prog__open_and_load();
> > @@ -1799,18 +1795,10 @@ static void run_pkt_test(struct test_spec *test, enum test_mode mode, enum test_
> > testapp_validate_traffic(test);
> > break;
> > case TEST_TYPE_POLL_TXQ_TMOUT:
> > - test_spec_set_name(test, "POLL_TXQ_FULL");
> > - test->ifobj_tx->use_poll = true;
> > - /* create invalid frame by set umem frame_size and pkt length equal to 2048 */
> > - test->ifobj_tx->umem->frame_size = 2048;
> > - pkt_stream_replace(test, 2 * DEFAULT_PKT_CNT, 2048);
> > - testapp_validate_traffic_single_thread(test, test->ifobj_tx, type);
> > - pkt_stream_restore_default(test);
> > + testapp_poll_txq_tmout(test);
> > break;
> > case TEST_TYPE_POLL_RXQ_TMOUT:
> > - test_spec_set_name(test, "POLL_RXQ_EMPTY");
> > - test->ifobj_rx->use_poll = true;
> > - testapp_validate_traffic_single_thread(test, test->ifobj_rx, type);
> > + testapp_poll_rxq_tmout(test);
> > break;
> > case TEST_TYPE_ALIGNED_INV_DESC:
> > test_spec_set_name(test, "ALIGNED_INV_DESC");
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists