[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221220153601.5f16545b@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 15:36:01 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, daniel@...earbox.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: tunnel: add sanity test for
checksums
On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 15:21:08 -0800 Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> Thanks for the fix and the idea on how to test it.
>
> I have posted a patch to translate this test to a test for test_progs that can
> finish and exit such that it can be run continuously in CI. The test attaches a
> tc-bpf at lo and the bpf prog directly checks for the skb->ip_summed ==
> CHECKSUM_NONE and the broken csum_start condition.
>
> If the test_progs patch looks good, patch 1 can be landed first and then land
> the test_progs patch. wdyt?
I'm not attached to the test, your patch looks good!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists