[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87o7rvhv8j.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 10:30:36 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Camelia Alexandra Groza <camelia.groza@....com>
Cc: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] powerpc: dts: t208x: Disable 10G on MAC1 and MAC2
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> writes:
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 15:41:00 +0000 Camelia Alexandra Groza wrote:
>> > Reviewed-by: Camelia Groza <camelia.groza@....com>
>> > Tested-by: Camelia Groza <camelia.groza@....com>
>>
>> I see the patch marked Not Applicable in the netdev patchwork.
>> What tree will it go through?
>
> I could be wrong but I think DTS patches are supposed to go via the
> platform / arch trees. We mostly take bindings via the networking trees
> (and DTS changes if they are part of a larger code+binding+dts set).
> But we can obviously apply this patch if that's the preference of
> the PowerPC maintainers..
The commit it Fixes went in via the networking tree, so I think it would
make sense for you to take this also via the networking tree.
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists