[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a198f9fa6737b22ed2839a5dbfbcfdf6c6d7508d.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 11:53:13 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Peter Delevoryas <peter@....dev>
Cc: sam@...dozajonas.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, joel@....id.au, gwshan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] net/ncsi: Add NC-SI 1.2 Get MC MAC Address command
On Tue, 2022-12-20 at 21:22 -0800, Peter Delevoryas wrote:
> This change adds support for the NC-SI 1.2 Get MC MAC Address command,
> specified here:
>
> https://www.dmtf.org/sites/default/files/standards/documents/DSP0222_1.2WIP90_0.pdf
>
> It serves the exact same function as the existing OEM Get MAC Address
> commands, so if a channel reports that it supports NC-SI 1.2, we prefer
> to use the standard command rather than the OEM command.
>
> Verified with an invalid MAC address and 2 valid ones:
>
> [ 55.137072] ftgmac100 1e690000.ftgmac eth0: NCSI: Received 3 provisioned MAC addresses
> [ 55.137614] ftgmac100 1e690000.ftgmac eth0: NCSI: MAC address 0: 00:00:00:00:00:00
> [ 55.138026] ftgmac100 1e690000.ftgmac eth0: NCSI: MAC address 1: fa:ce:b0:0c:20:22
> [ 55.138528] ftgmac100 1e690000.ftgmac eth0: NCSI: MAC address 2: fa:ce:b0:0c:20:23
> [ 55.139241] ftgmac100 1e690000.ftgmac eth0: NCSI: Unable to assign 00:00:00:00:00:00 to device
> [ 55.140098] ftgmac100 1e690000.ftgmac eth0: NCSI: Set MAC address to fa:ce:b0:0c:20:22
>
> IMPORTANT NOTE:
>
> The code I'm submitting here is parsing the MAC addresses as if they are
> transmitted in *reverse* order.
>
> This is different from how every other NC-SI command is parsed in the
> Linux kernel, even though the spec describes the format in the same way
> for every command.
>
> The *reason* for this is that I was able to test this code against the
> new 200G Broadcom NIC, which reports that it supports NC-SI 1.2 in Get
> Version ID and successfully responds to this command. It transmits the
> MAC addresses in reverse byte order.
>
> Nvidia's new 200G NIC doesn't support NC-SI 1.2 yet. I don't know how
> they're planning to implement it.
All the above looks like a good reason to wait for at least a
stable/documented H/W implementation, before pushing code to the
networking core.
> net/ncsi/ncsi-cmd.c | 3 ++-
> net/ncsi/ncsi-manage.c | 9 +++++++--
> net/ncsi/ncsi-pkt.h | 10 ++++++++++
> net/ncsi/ncsi-rsp.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 4 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ncsi/ncsi-cmd.c b/net/ncsi/ncsi-cmd.c
> index dda8b76b7798..7be177f55173 100644
> --- a/net/ncsi/ncsi-cmd.c
> +++ b/net/ncsi/ncsi-cmd.c
> @@ -269,7 +269,8 @@ static struct ncsi_cmd_handler {
> { NCSI_PKT_CMD_GPS, 0, ncsi_cmd_handler_default },
> { NCSI_PKT_CMD_OEM, -1, ncsi_cmd_handler_oem },
> { NCSI_PKT_CMD_PLDM, 0, NULL },
> - { NCSI_PKT_CMD_GPUUID, 0, ncsi_cmd_handler_default }
> + { NCSI_PKT_CMD_GPUUID, 0, ncsi_cmd_handler_default },
> + { NCSI_PKT_CMD_GMCMA, 0, ncsi_cmd_handler_default }
> };
>
> static struct ncsi_request *ncsi_alloc_command(struct ncsi_cmd_arg *nca)
> diff --git a/net/ncsi/ncsi-manage.c b/net/ncsi/ncsi-manage.c
> index f56795769893..bc1887a2543d 100644
> --- a/net/ncsi/ncsi-manage.c
> +++ b/net/ncsi/ncsi-manage.c
> @@ -1038,11 +1038,16 @@ static void ncsi_configure_channel(struct ncsi_dev_priv *ndp)
> case ncsi_dev_state_config_oem_gma:
> nd->state = ncsi_dev_state_config_clear_vids;
>
> - nca.type = NCSI_PKT_CMD_OEM;
> nca.package = np->id;
> nca.channel = nc->id;
> ndp->pending_req_num = 1;
> - ret = ncsi_gma_handler(&nca, nc->version.mf_id);
> + if (nc->version.major >= 1 && nc->version.minor >= 2) {
> + nca.type = NCSI_PKT_CMD_GMCMA;
> + ret = ncsi_xmit_cmd(&nca);
> + } else {
> + nca.type = NCSI_PKT_CMD_OEM;
> + ret = ncsi_gma_handler(&nca, nc->version.mf_id);
> + }
> if (ret < 0)
> schedule_work(&ndp->work);
>
> diff --git a/net/ncsi/ncsi-pkt.h b/net/ncsi/ncsi-pkt.h
> index c9d1da34dc4d..f2f3b5c1b941 100644
> --- a/net/ncsi/ncsi-pkt.h
> +++ b/net/ncsi/ncsi-pkt.h
> @@ -338,6 +338,14 @@ struct ncsi_rsp_gpuuid_pkt {
> __be32 checksum;
> };
>
> +/* Get MC MAC Address */
> +struct ncsi_rsp_gmcma_pkt {
> + struct ncsi_rsp_pkt_hdr rsp;
> + unsigned char address_count;
> + unsigned char reserved[3];
> + unsigned char addresses[][ETH_ALEN];
> +};
> +
> /* AEN: Link State Change */
> struct ncsi_aen_lsc_pkt {
> struct ncsi_aen_pkt_hdr aen; /* AEN header */
> @@ -398,6 +406,7 @@ struct ncsi_aen_hncdsc_pkt {
> #define NCSI_PKT_CMD_GPUUID 0x52 /* Get package UUID */
> #define NCSI_PKT_CMD_QPNPR 0x56 /* Query Pending NC PLDM request */
> #define NCSI_PKT_CMD_SNPR 0x57 /* Send NC PLDM Reply */
> +#define NCSI_PKT_CMD_GMCMA 0x58 /* Get MC MAC Address */
>
>
> /* NCSI packet responses */
> @@ -433,6 +442,7 @@ struct ncsi_aen_hncdsc_pkt {
> #define NCSI_PKT_RSP_GPUUID (NCSI_PKT_CMD_GPUUID + 0x80)
> #define NCSI_PKT_RSP_QPNPR (NCSI_PKT_CMD_QPNPR + 0x80)
> #define NCSI_PKT_RSP_SNPR (NCSI_PKT_CMD_SNPR + 0x80)
> +#define NCSI_PKT_RSP_GMCMA (NCSI_PKT_CMD_GMCMA + 0x80)
>
> /* NCSI response code/reason */
> #define NCSI_PKT_RSP_C_COMPLETED 0x0000 /* Command Completed */
> diff --git a/net/ncsi/ncsi-rsp.c b/net/ncsi/ncsi-rsp.c
> index 7a805b86a12d..28a042688d0b 100644
> --- a/net/ncsi/ncsi-rsp.c
> +++ b/net/ncsi/ncsi-rsp.c
> @@ -1140,6 +1140,48 @@ static int ncsi_rsp_handler_netlink(struct ncsi_request *nr)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int ncsi_rsp_handler_gmcma(struct ncsi_request *nr)
> +{
> + struct ncsi_dev_priv *ndp = nr->ndp;
> + struct net_device *ndev = ndp->ndev.dev;
> + struct ncsi_rsp_gmcma_pkt *rsp;
> + struct sockaddr saddr;
> + int ret = -1;
> + int i;
> + int j;
> +
> + rsp = (struct ncsi_rsp_gmcma_pkt *)skb_network_header(nr->rsp);
> + saddr.sa_family = ndev->type;
> + ndev->priv_flags |= IFF_LIVE_ADDR_CHANGE;
> +
> + netdev_warn(ndev, "NCSI: Received %d provisioned MAC addresses\n",
> + rsp->address_count);
> + for (i = 0; i < rsp->address_count; i++) {
> + netdev_warn(ndev, "NCSI: MAC address %d: "
> + "%02x:%02x:%02x:%02x:%02x:%02x\n", i,
> + rsp->addresses[i][5], rsp->addresses[i][4],
> + rsp->addresses[i][3], rsp->addresses[i][2],
> + rsp->addresses[i][1], rsp->addresses[i][0]);
> + }
You must avoid this kind of debug messages on 'warn' level (more
below). You could consider pr_debug() instead or completely drop the
message.
Cheers,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists