[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6b529058-3650-72bb-7541-9fbfb8c6ad9b@broadcom.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 11:59:53 +0100
From: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>
To: shaozhengchao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com,
SHA-cyfmac-dev-list@...ineon.com, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
aspriel@...il.com, franky.lin@...adcom.com,
hante.meuleman@...adcom.com, wright.feng@...ress.com,
chi-hsien.lin@...ress.com, a.fatoum@...gutronix.de,
alsi@...g-olufsen.dk, pieterpg@...adcom.com, dekim@...adcom.com,
linville@...driver.com, weiyongjun1@...wei.com,
yuehaibing@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: brcmfmac: unmap dma buffer in
brcmf_msgbuf_alloc_pktid()
On 12/22/2022 9:52 AM, shaozhengchao wrote:
>
>
> On 2022/12/22 16:46, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de> writes:
>>
>>> On 2022-12-21 18:33:06 [+0000], Kalle Valo wrote:
>>>> Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> After the DMA buffer is mapped to a physical address, address is
>>>>> stored
>>>>> in pktids in brcmf_msgbuf_alloc_pktid(). Then, pktids is parsed in
>>>>> brcmf_msgbuf_get_pktid()/brcmf_msgbuf_release_array() to obtain
>>>>> physaddr
>>>>> and later unmap the DMA buffer. But when count is always equal to
>>>>> pktids->array_size, physaddr isn't stored in pktids and the DMA buffer
>>>>> will not be unmapped anyway.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 9a1bb60250d2 ("brcmfmac: Adding msgbuf protocol.")
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>
>>>>
>>>> Can someone review this?
>>>
>>> After looking at the code, that skb is mapped but not inserted into the
>>> ringbuffer in this condition. The function returns with an error and the
>>> caller will free that skb (or add to a list for later). Either way the
>>> skb remains mapped which is wrong. The unmap here is the right thing to
>>> do.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
>>
>> Thanks for the review, very much appreciated.
>>
>
> Thank you very much.
Good catch. Has this path been observed or is this found by inspecting
the code? Just curious.
Regards,
Arend
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4219 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists