[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <070c6690ad7ea537a7081bc9faa0f78861751bc4.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 12:13:44 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Leesoo Ahn <lsahn@...eel.net>
Cc: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] usbnet: optimize usbnet_bh() to reduce CPU load
On Wed, 2022-12-21 at 16:59 +0900, Leesoo Ahn wrote:
> The current source pushes skb into dev->done queue by calling
> skb_queue_tail() and then pop it by calling skb_dequeue() to branch to
> rx_cleanup state for freeing urb/skb in usbnet_bh(). It takes extra CPU
> load, 2.21% (skb_queue_tail) as follows.
>
> - 11.58% 0.26% swapper [k] usbnet_bh
> - 11.32% usbnet_bh
> - 6.43% skb_dequeue
> 6.34% _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
> - 2.21% skb_queue_tail
> 2.19% _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
> - 1.68% consume_skb
> - 0.97% kfree_skbmem
> 0.80% kmem_cache_free
> 0.53% skb_release_data
>
> To reduce the extra CPU load use return values jumping to rx_cleanup
> state directly to free them instead of calling skb_queue_tail() and
> skb_dequeue() for push/pop respectively.
>
> - 7.87% 0.25% swapper [k] usbnet_bh
> - 7.62% usbnet_bh
> - 4.81% skb_dequeue
> 4.74% _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
> - 1.75% consume_skb
> - 0.98% kfree_skbmem
> 0.78% kmem_cache_free
> 0.58% skb_release_data
> 0.53% smsc95xx_rx_fixup
>
> Signed-off-by: Leesoo Ahn <lsahn@...eel.net>
> ---
> v3:
> - Replace return values with proper -ERR values in rx_process()
>
> v2:
> - Replace goto label with return statement to reduce goto entropy
> - Add CPU load information by perf in commit message
>
> v1 at:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20221217161851.829497-1-lsahn@ooseel.net/
This looks like net-next material.
We have already submitted the networking pull request to Linus
for v6.2 and therefore net-next is closed for new drivers, features,
code refactoring and optimizations. We are currently accepting
bug fixes only.
Please repost when net-next reopens after Jan 2nd, including the
expected 'net-next' tag into the subject line.
RFC patches sent for review only are obviously welcome at any time.
[...]
> @@ -1528,13 +1526,14 @@ static void usbnet_bh (struct timer_list *t)
> entry = (struct skb_data *) skb->cb;
> switch (entry->state) {
> case rx_done:
> - entry->state = rx_cleanup;
> - rx_process (dev, skb);
> + if (rx_process(dev, skb))
> + goto cleanup;
You can avoid this additional label (which is a little confusing inside
a switch) factoring out a usb_free_skb(skb) helper and calling it here
and under the rx_cleanup case.
Cheers,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists