lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 14:35:45 +0100 From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com> To: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org Cc: tony0620emma@...il.com, kvalo@...nel.org, pkshih@...ltek.com, tehuang@...ltek.com, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com> Subject: [PATCH 2/4] rtw88: Configure the registers from rtw_bf_assoc() outside the RCU lock USB and (upcoming) SDIO support may sleep in the read/write handlers. Shrink the RCU critical section so it only cover the call to ieee80211_find_sta() and finding the ic_vht_cap/vht_cap based on the found station. This moves the chip's BFEE configuration outside the rcu_read_lock section and thus prevent "scheduling while atomic" or "Voluntary context switch within RCU read-side critical section!" warnings when accessing the registers using an SDIO card (which is where this issue has been spotted in the real world - but it also affects USB cards). Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com> --- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/bf.c | 13 +++++++------ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/bf.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/bf.c index 038a30b170ef..c827c4a2814b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/bf.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/bf.c @@ -49,19 +49,23 @@ void rtw_bf_assoc(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct ieee80211_vif *vif, sta = ieee80211_find_sta(vif, bssid); if (!sta) { + rcu_read_unlock(); + rtw_warn(rtwdev, "failed to find station entry for bss %pM\n", bssid); - goto out_unlock; + return; } ic_vht_cap = &hw->wiphy->bands[NL80211_BAND_5GHZ]->vht_cap; vht_cap = &sta->deflink.vht_cap; + rcu_read_unlock(); + if ((ic_vht_cap->cap & IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_MU_BEAMFORMEE_CAPABLE) && (vht_cap->cap & IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_MU_BEAMFORMER_CAPABLE)) { if (bfinfo->bfer_mu_cnt >= chip->bfer_mu_max_num) { rtw_dbg(rtwdev, RTW_DBG_BF, "mu bfer number over limit\n"); - goto out_unlock; + return; } ether_addr_copy(bfee->mac_addr, bssid); @@ -75,7 +79,7 @@ void rtw_bf_assoc(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct ieee80211_vif *vif, (vht_cap->cap & IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SU_BEAMFORMER_CAPABLE)) { if (bfinfo->bfer_su_cnt >= chip->bfer_su_max_num) { rtw_dbg(rtwdev, RTW_DBG_BF, "su bfer number over limit\n"); - goto out_unlock; + return; } sound_dim = vht_cap->cap & @@ -98,9 +102,6 @@ void rtw_bf_assoc(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct ieee80211_vif *vif, rtw_chip_config_bfee(rtwdev, rtwvif, bfee, true); } - -out_unlock: - rcu_read_unlock(); } void rtw_bf_init_bfer_entry_mu(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, -- 2.39.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists