lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 14:35:47 +0100 From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com> To: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org Cc: tony0620emma@...il.com, kvalo@...nel.org, pkshih@...ltek.com, tehuang@...ltek.com, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com> Subject: [PATCH 4/4] rtw88: Use non-atomic rtw_iterate_stas() in rtw_ra_mask_info_update() USB and (upcoming) SDIO support may sleep in the read/write handlers. Use non-atomic rtw_iterate_stas() in rtw_ra_mask_info_update() because the iterator function rtw_ra_mask_info_update_iter() needs to read and write registers from within rtw_update_sta_info(). Using the non-atomic iterator ensures that we can sleep during USB and SDIO register reads and writes. This fixes "scheduling while atomic" or "Voluntary context switch within RCU read-side critical section!" warnings as seen by SDIO card users (but it also affects USB cards). Fixes: 78d5bf925f30 ("wifi: rtw88: iterate over vif/sta list non-atomically") Suggested-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com> --- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac80211.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac80211.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac80211.c index 776a9a9884b5..3b92ac611d3f 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac80211.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac80211.c @@ -737,7 +737,7 @@ static void rtw_ra_mask_info_update(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, br_data.rtwdev = rtwdev; br_data.vif = vif; br_data.mask = mask; - rtw_iterate_stas_atomic(rtwdev, rtw_ra_mask_info_update_iter, &br_data); + rtw_iterate_stas(rtwdev, rtw_ra_mask_info_update_iter, &br_data); } static int rtw_ops_set_bitrate_mask(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, @@ -746,7 +746,9 @@ static int rtw_ops_set_bitrate_mask(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, { struct rtw_dev *rtwdev = hw->priv; + mutex_lock(&rtwdev->mutex); rtw_ra_mask_info_update(rtwdev, vif, mask); + mutex_unlock(&rtwdev->mutex); return 0; } -- 2.39.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists