lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9f408a8c-4e23-9de5-0ee8-5deccd901543@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Jan 2023 09:03:18 -0800
From:   Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        <pabeni@...hat.com>, <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/9] devlink: always check if the devlink
 instance is registered



On 1/5/2023 10:33 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Always check under the instance lock whether the devlink instance
> is still / already registered.
> 
> This is a no-op for the most part, as the unregistration path currently
> waits for all references. On the init path, however, we may temporarily
> open up a race with netdev code, if netdevs are registered before the
> devlink instance. This is temporary, the next change fixes it, and this
> commit has been split out for the ease of review.
> 
> Note that in case of iterating over sub-objects which have their
> own lock (regions and line cards) we assume an implicit dependency
> between those objects existing and devlink unregistration.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> ---
>  net/devlink/core.c          | 19 +++++++++++++++----
>  net/devlink/devl_internal.h |  8 ++++++++
>  net/devlink/leftover.c      | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  net/devlink/netlink.c       | 10 ++++++++--
>  4 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/devlink/core.c b/net/devlink/core.c
> index d3b8336946fd..c53c996edf1d 100644
> --- a/net/devlink/core.c
> +++ b/net/devlink/core.c
> @@ -67,6 +67,15 @@ void devl_unlock(struct devlink *devlink)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devl_unlock);
>  
> +/**
> + * devlink_try_get() - try to obtain a reference on a devlink instance
> + * @devlink: instance to reference
> + *
> + * Obtain a reference on a devlink instance. A reference on a devlink instance
> + * only implies that it's safe to take the instance lock. It does not imply
> + * that the instance is registered, use devl_is_registered() after taking
> + * the instance lock to check registration status.
> + */
>  struct devlink *__must_check devlink_try_get(struct devlink *devlink)
>  {
>  	if (refcount_inc_not_zero(&devlink->refcount))
> @@ -300,10 +309,12 @@ static void __net_exit devlink_pernet_pre_exit(struct net *net)
>  	devlinks_xa_for_each_registered_get(net, index, devlink) {
>  		WARN_ON(!(devlink->features & DEVLINK_F_RELOAD));
>  		devl_lock(devlink);
> -		err = devlink_reload(devlink, &init_net,
> -				     DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT,
> -				     DEVLINK_RELOAD_LIMIT_UNSPEC,
> -				     &actions_performed, NULL);
> +		err = 0;
> +		if (devl_is_registered(devlink))
> +			err = devlink_reload(devlink, &init_net,
> +					     DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT,
> +					     DEVLINK_RELOAD_LIMIT_UNSPEC,
> +					     &actions_performed, NULL);
>  		devl_unlock(devlink);
>  		devlink_put(devlink);
>  
> diff --git a/net/devlink/devl_internal.h b/net/devlink/devl_internal.h
> index 6342552e5f99..01a00df81d0e 100644
> --- a/net/devlink/devl_internal.h
> +++ b/net/devlink/devl_internal.h
> @@ -86,6 +86,14 @@ extern struct genl_family devlink_nl_family;
>  
>  struct devlink *devlinks_xa_find_get(struct net *net, unsigned long *indexp);
>  
> +static inline bool devl_is_registered(struct devlink *devlink)
> +{
> +	/* To prevent races the caller must hold the instance lock
> +	 * or another lock taken during unregistration.
> +	 */

Why not just lockdep_assert here on the instance lock? I guess this
comment implies that another lock could be used instead but it seems
weird to allow that? I guess because of things like the linecards_lock
as opposed to the instance lock?

Thanks,
Jake

> +	return xa_get_mark(&devlinks, devlink->index, DEVLINK_REGISTERED);
> +}
> +
>  /* Netlink */
>  #define DEVLINK_NL_FLAG_NEED_PORT		BIT(0)
>  #define DEVLINK_NL_FLAG_NEED_DEVLINK_OR_PORT	BIT(1)
> diff --git a/net/devlink/leftover.c b/net/devlink/leftover.c
> index bec408da4dbe..491f821c8b77 100644
> --- a/net/devlink/leftover.c
> +++ b/net/devlink/leftover.c
> @@ -2130,6 +2130,9 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_linecard_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *msg,
>  		int idx = 0;
>  
>  		mutex_lock(&devlink->linecards_lock);
> +		if (!devl_is_registered(devlink))
> +			goto next_devlink;
> +
>  		list_for_each_entry(linecard, &devlink->linecard_list, list) {
>  			if (idx < state->idx) {
>  				idx++;
> @@ -2151,6 +2154,7 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_linecard_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *msg,
>  			}
>  			idx++;
>  		}
> +next_devlink:
>  		mutex_unlock(&devlink->linecards_lock);
>  		devlink_put(devlink);
>  	}
> @@ -7809,6 +7813,12 @@ devlink_nl_cmd_health_reporter_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *msg,
>  		int idx = 0;
>  
>  		mutex_lock(&devlink->reporters_lock);
> +		if (!devl_is_registered(devlink)) {
> +			mutex_unlock(&devlink->reporters_lock);
> +			devlink_put(devlink);
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +
>  		list_for_each_entry(reporter, &devlink->reporter_list,
>  				    list) {
>  			if (idx < state->idx) {
> @@ -7830,6 +7840,9 @@ devlink_nl_cmd_health_reporter_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *msg,
>  		mutex_unlock(&devlink->reporters_lock);
>  
>  		devl_lock(devlink);
> +		if (!devl_is_registered(devlink))
> +			goto next_devlink;
> +
>  		xa_for_each(&devlink->ports, port_index, port) {
>  			mutex_lock(&port->reporters_lock);
>  			list_for_each_entry(reporter, &port->reporter_list, list) {
> @@ -7853,6 +7866,7 @@ devlink_nl_cmd_health_reporter_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *msg,
>  			}
>  			mutex_unlock(&port->reporters_lock);
>  		}
> +next_devlink:
>  		devl_unlock(devlink);
>  		devlink_put(devlink);
>  	}
> @@ -12218,7 +12232,8 @@ void devlink_compat_running_version(struct devlink *devlink,
>  		return;
>  
>  	devl_lock(devlink);
> -	__devlink_compat_running_version(devlink, buf, len);
> +	if (devl_is_registered(devlink))
> +		__devlink_compat_running_version(devlink, buf, len);
>  	devl_unlock(devlink);
>  }
>  
> @@ -12227,20 +12242,28 @@ int devlink_compat_flash_update(struct devlink *devlink, const char *file_name)
>  	struct devlink_flash_update_params params = {};
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	if (!devlink->ops->flash_update)
> -		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +	devl_lock(devlink);
> +	if (!devl_is_registered(devlink)) {
> +		ret = -ENODEV;
> +		goto out_unlock;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!devlink->ops->flash_update) {
> +		ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +		goto out_unlock;
> +	}
>  
>  	ret = request_firmware(&params.fw, file_name, devlink->dev);
>  	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> +		goto out_unlock;
>  
> -	devl_lock(devlink);
>  	devlink_flash_update_begin_notify(devlink);
>  	ret = devlink->ops->flash_update(devlink, &params, NULL);
>  	devlink_flash_update_end_notify(devlink);
> -	devl_unlock(devlink);
>  
>  	release_firmware(params.fw);
> +out_unlock:
> +	devl_unlock(devlink);
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> diff --git a/net/devlink/netlink.c b/net/devlink/netlink.c
> index 69111746f5d9..b5b8ac6db2d1 100644
> --- a/net/devlink/netlink.c
> +++ b/net/devlink/netlink.c
> @@ -98,7 +98,8 @@ devlink_get_from_attrs_lock(struct net *net, struct nlattr **attrs)
>  
>  	devlinks_xa_for_each_registered_get(net, index, devlink) {
>  		devl_lock(devlink);
> -		if (strcmp(devlink->dev->bus->name, busname) == 0 &&
> +		if (devl_is_registered(devlink) &&
> +		    strcmp(devlink->dev->bus->name, busname) == 0 &&
>  		    strcmp(dev_name(devlink->dev), devname) == 0)
>  			return devlink;
>  		devl_unlock(devlink);
> @@ -211,7 +212,12 @@ int devlink_nl_instance_iter_dump(struct sk_buff *msg,
>  
>  	devlink_dump_for_each_instance_get(msg, state, devlink) {
>  		devl_lock(devlink);
> -		err = cmd->dump_one(msg, devlink, cb);
> +
> +		if (devl_is_registered(devlink))
> +			err = cmd->dump_one(msg, devlink, cb);
> +		else
> +			err = 0;
> +
>  		devl_unlock(devlink);
>  		devlink_put(devlink);
>  

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ