| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <5c8b538bcc9ac75027f41c21e810d3707a2e1ec7.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 10:36:58 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>,
Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
kernel <kernel@...rdevices.ru>,
Krasnov Arseniy <oxffffaa@...il.com>,
Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 4/4] test/vsock: vsock_perf utility
Hi,
sorry for the late feedback, a couple of notes below...
On Sun, 2023-01-08 at 20:43 +0000, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
> This adds utility to check vsock rx/tx performance.
>
> Usage as sender:
> ./vsock_perf --sender <cid> --port <port> --bytes <bytes to send>
> Usage as receiver:
> ./vsock_perf --port <port> --rcvlowat <SO_RCVLOWAT>
>
> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
> Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/vsock/Makefile | 3 +-
> tools/testing/vsock/README | 34 +++
> tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c | 441 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 477 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/Makefile b/tools/testing/vsock/Makefile
> index f8293c6910c9..43a254f0e14d 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/vsock/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/vsock/Makefile
> @@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> -all: test
> +all: test vsock_perf
> test: vsock_test vsock_diag_test
> vsock_test: vsock_test.o timeout.o control.o util.o
> vsock_diag_test: vsock_diag_test.o timeout.o control.o util.o
> +vsock_perf: vsock_perf.o
>
> CFLAGS += -g -O2 -Werror -Wall -I. -I../../include -I../../../usr/include -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-strict-overflow -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -MMD -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE
> .PHONY: all test clean
> diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/README b/tools/testing/vsock/README
> index 4d5045e7d2c3..84ee217ba8ee 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/vsock/README
> +++ b/tools/testing/vsock/README
> @@ -35,3 +35,37 @@ Invoke test binaries in both directions as follows:
> --control-port=$GUEST_IP \
> --control-port=1234 \
> --peer-cid=3
> +
> +vsock_perf utility
> +-------------------
> +'vsock_perf' is a simple tool to measure vsock performance. It works in
> +sender/receiver modes: sender connect to peer at the specified port and
> +starts data transmission to the receiver. After data processing is done,
> +it prints several metrics(see below).
> +
> +Usage:
> +# run as sender
> +# connect to CID 2, port 1234, send 1G of data, tx buf size is 1M
> +./vsock_perf --sender 2 --port 1234 --bytes 1G --buf-size 1M
> +
> +Output:
> +tx performance: A Gbits/s
> +
> +Output explanation:
> +A is calculated as "number of bits to send" / "time in tx loop"
> +
> +# run as receiver
> +# listen port 1234, rx buf size is 1M, socket buf size is 1G, SO_RCVLOWAT is 64K
> +./vsock_perf --port 1234 --buf-size 1M --vsk-size 1G --rcvlowat 64K
> +
> +Output:
> +rx performance: A Gbits/s
> +total in 'read()': B sec
> +POLLIN wakeups: C
> +average in 'read()': D ns
> +
> +Output explanation:
> +A is calculated as "number of received bits" / "time in rx loop".
> +B is time, spent in 'read()' system call(excluding 'poll()')
> +C is number of 'poll()' wake ups with POLLIN bit set.
> +D is B / C, e.g. average amount of time, spent in single 'read()'.
> diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ccd595462b40
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,441 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * vsock_perf - benchmark utility for vsock.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2022 SberDevices.
> + *
> + * Author: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
> + */
> +#include <getopt.h>
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include <stdbool.h>
> +#include <string.h>
> +#include <errno.h>
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +#include <time.h>
> +#include <stdint.h>
> +#include <poll.h>
> +#include <sys/socket.h>
> +#include <linux/vm_sockets.h>
> +
> +#define DEFAULT_BUF_SIZE_BYTES (128 * 1024)
> +#define DEFAULT_TO_SEND_BYTES (64 * 1024)
> +#define DEFAULT_VSOCK_BUF_BYTES (256 * 1024)
> +#define DEFAULT_RCVLOWAT_BYTES 1
> +#define DEFAULT_PORT 1234
> +
> +#define BYTES_PER_GB (1024 * 1024 * 1024ULL)
> +#define NSEC_PER_SEC (1000000000ULL)
> +
> +static unsigned int port = DEFAULT_PORT;
> +static unsigned long buf_size_bytes = DEFAULT_BUF_SIZE_BYTES;
> +static unsigned long vsock_buf_bytes = DEFAULT_VSOCK_BUF_BYTES;
> +
> +static inline time_t current_nsec(void)
Minor nit: you should avoid 'static inline' functions in c files,
'static' would suffice and will allow the compiler to do a better job.
> +{
> + struct timespec ts;
> +
> + if (clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME, &ts)) {
> + perror("clock_gettime");
> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> + }
> +
> + return (ts.tv_sec * NSEC_PER_SEC) + ts.tv_nsec;
> +}
> +
> +/* From lib/cmdline.c. */
> +static unsigned long memparse(const char *ptr)
> +{
> + char *endptr;
> +
> + unsigned long long ret = strtoull(ptr, &endptr, 0);
> +
> + switch (*endptr) {
> + case 'E':
> + case 'e':
> + ret <<= 10;
> + case 'P':
> + case 'p':
> + ret <<= 10;
> + case 'T':
> + case 't':
> + ret <<= 10;
> + case 'G':
> + case 'g':
> + ret <<= 10;
> + case 'M':
> + case 'm':
> + ret <<= 10;
> + case 'K':
> + case 'k':
> + ret <<= 10;
> + endptr++;
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void vsock_increase_buf_size(int fd)
> +{
> + if (setsockopt(fd, AF_VSOCK, SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_MAX_SIZE,
> + &vsock_buf_bytes, sizeof(vsock_buf_bytes))) {
> + perror("setsockopt(SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_MAX_SIZE)");
> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> + }
> +
> + if (setsockopt(fd, AF_VSOCK, SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_SIZE,
> + &vsock_buf_bytes, sizeof(vsock_buf_bytes))) {
> + perror("setsockopt(SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_SIZE)");
> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
You use the above pattern frequently, but you could replace both
libcall with a single error() call.
Thanks,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists