| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 10:20:22 +0000
From: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
kernel <kernel@...rdevices.ru>,
Krasnov Arseniy <oxffffaa@...il.com>,
Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 4/4] test/vsock: vsock_perf utility
On 10.01.2023 12:36, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry for the late feedback, a couple of notes below...
Hello! Thanks for review! just fixed it in v7
Thanks, Arseniy
>
> On Sun, 2023-01-08 at 20:43 +0000, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>> This adds utility to check vsock rx/tx performance.
>>
>> Usage as sender:
>> ./vsock_perf --sender <cid> --port <port> --bytes <bytes to send>
>> Usage as receiver:
>> ./vsock_perf --port <port> --rcvlowat <SO_RCVLOWAT>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
>> Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> tools/testing/vsock/Makefile | 3 +-
>> tools/testing/vsock/README | 34 +++
>> tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c | 441 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 477 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/Makefile b/tools/testing/vsock/Makefile
>> index f8293c6910c9..43a254f0e14d 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/vsock/Makefile
>> +++ b/tools/testing/vsock/Makefile
>> @@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
>> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>> -all: test
>> +all: test vsock_perf
>> test: vsock_test vsock_diag_test
>> vsock_test: vsock_test.o timeout.o control.o util.o
>> vsock_diag_test: vsock_diag_test.o timeout.o control.o util.o
>> +vsock_perf: vsock_perf.o
>>
>> CFLAGS += -g -O2 -Werror -Wall -I. -I../../include -I../../../usr/include -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-strict-overflow -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -MMD -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE
>> .PHONY: all test clean
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/README b/tools/testing/vsock/README
>> index 4d5045e7d2c3..84ee217ba8ee 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/vsock/README
>> +++ b/tools/testing/vsock/README
>> @@ -35,3 +35,37 @@ Invoke test binaries in both directions as follows:
>> --control-port=$GUEST_IP \
>> --control-port=1234 \
>> --peer-cid=3
>> +
>> +vsock_perf utility
>> +-------------------
>> +'vsock_perf' is a simple tool to measure vsock performance. It works in
>> +sender/receiver modes: sender connect to peer at the specified port and
>> +starts data transmission to the receiver. After data processing is done,
>> +it prints several metrics(see below).
>> +
>> +Usage:
>> +# run as sender
>> +# connect to CID 2, port 1234, send 1G of data, tx buf size is 1M
>> +./vsock_perf --sender 2 --port 1234 --bytes 1G --buf-size 1M
>> +
>> +Output:
>> +tx performance: A Gbits/s
>> +
>> +Output explanation:
>> +A is calculated as "number of bits to send" / "time in tx loop"
>> +
>> +# run as receiver
>> +# listen port 1234, rx buf size is 1M, socket buf size is 1G, SO_RCVLOWAT is 64K
>> +./vsock_perf --port 1234 --buf-size 1M --vsk-size 1G --rcvlowat 64K
>> +
>> +Output:
>> +rx performance: A Gbits/s
>> +total in 'read()': B sec
>> +POLLIN wakeups: C
>> +average in 'read()': D ns
>> +
>> +Output explanation:
>> +A is calculated as "number of received bits" / "time in rx loop".
>> +B is time, spent in 'read()' system call(excluding 'poll()')
>> +C is number of 'poll()' wake ups with POLLIN bit set.
>> +D is B / C, e.g. average amount of time, spent in single 'read()'.
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..ccd595462b40
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,441 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>> +/*
>> + * vsock_perf - benchmark utility for vsock.
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2022 SberDevices.
>> + *
>> + * Author: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
>> + */
>> +#include <getopt.h>
>> +#include <stdio.h>
>> +#include <stdlib.h>
>> +#include <stdbool.h>
>> +#include <string.h>
>> +#include <errno.h>
>> +#include <unistd.h>
>> +#include <time.h>
>> +#include <stdint.h>
>> +#include <poll.h>
>> +#include <sys/socket.h>
>> +#include <linux/vm_sockets.h>
>> +
>> +#define DEFAULT_BUF_SIZE_BYTES (128 * 1024)
>> +#define DEFAULT_TO_SEND_BYTES (64 * 1024)
>> +#define DEFAULT_VSOCK_BUF_BYTES (256 * 1024)
>> +#define DEFAULT_RCVLOWAT_BYTES 1
>> +#define DEFAULT_PORT 1234
>> +
>> +#define BYTES_PER_GB (1024 * 1024 * 1024ULL)
>> +#define NSEC_PER_SEC (1000000000ULL)
>> +
>> +static unsigned int port = DEFAULT_PORT;
>> +static unsigned long buf_size_bytes = DEFAULT_BUF_SIZE_BYTES;
>> +static unsigned long vsock_buf_bytes = DEFAULT_VSOCK_BUF_BYTES;
>> +
>> +static inline time_t current_nsec(void)
>
> Minor nit: you should avoid 'static inline' functions in c files,
> 'static' would suffice and will allow the compiler to do a better job.
>
>> +{
>> + struct timespec ts;
>> +
>> + if (clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME, &ts)) {
>> + perror("clock_gettime");
>> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return (ts.tv_sec * NSEC_PER_SEC) + ts.tv_nsec;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* From lib/cmdline.c. */
>> +static unsigned long memparse(const char *ptr)
>> +{
>> + char *endptr;
>> +
>> + unsigned long long ret = strtoull(ptr, &endptr, 0);
>> +
>> + switch (*endptr) {
>> + case 'E':
>> + case 'e':
>> + ret <<= 10;
>> + case 'P':
>> + case 'p':
>> + ret <<= 10;
>> + case 'T':
>> + case 't':
>> + ret <<= 10;
>> + case 'G':
>> + case 'g':
>> + ret <<= 10;
>> + case 'M':
>> + case 'm':
>> + ret <<= 10;
>> + case 'K':
>> + case 'k':
>> + ret <<= 10;
>> + endptr++;
>> + default:
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void vsock_increase_buf_size(int fd)
>> +{
>> + if (setsockopt(fd, AF_VSOCK, SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_MAX_SIZE,
>> + &vsock_buf_bytes, sizeof(vsock_buf_bytes))) {
>> + perror("setsockopt(SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_MAX_SIZE)");
>> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (setsockopt(fd, AF_VSOCK, SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_SIZE,
>> + &vsock_buf_bytes, sizeof(vsock_buf_bytes))) {
>> + perror("setsockopt(SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_SIZE)");
>> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
>
> You use the above pattern frequently, but you could replace both
> libcall with a single error() call.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paolo
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists