[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y71h7OF6ydo2A0dw@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 13:02:36 +0000
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 0/2] Add I2C fwnode lookup/get interfaces
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 12:48:37PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > This RFC series is intended for the next merge window, but we will need
> > to decide how to merge it as it is split across two subsystems. These
> > patches have been generated against the net-next, since patch 2 depends
> > on a recently merged patch in that tree (which is now in mainline.)
>
> I'd prefer to apply it all to my I2C tree then. I can also provide an
> immutable branch for net if that is helpful.
If we go for the immutable branch, then patch 2 might as well be
merged via the net tree, if net-next is willing to pull your
immutable branch.
Dave? Jakub? Paolo? Do you have any preferences how you'd like to
handle this?
Thanks.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists