[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iJmmENm6DTP4qjkN23j_KT7ZS_hweR5qks4VETsUzA_eQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 15:28:58 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
kernel-team@...udflare.com, Marek Majkowski <marek@...udflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] inet: Add IP_LOCAL_PORT_RANGE socket option
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 2:37 PM Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com> wrote:
>
> Users who want to share a single public IP address for outgoing connections
> between several hosts traditionally reach for SNAT. However, SNAT requires
> state keeping on the node(s) performing the NAT.
>
> v1 -> v2:
> * Fix the corner case when the per-socket range doesn't overlap with the
> per-netns range. Fallback correctly to the per-netns range. (Kuniyuki)
>
> Reviewed-by: Marek Majkowski <marek@...udflare.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
> ---
> include/net/inet_sock.h | 4 ++++
> include/net/ip.h | 3 ++-
> include/uapi/linux/in.h | 1 +
> net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
> net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c | 2 +-
> net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> net/ipv4/udp.c | 2 +-
> 7 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Being an INET option, I think net/sctp/socket.c should also be changed.
Not clear if selinux_socket_bind() needs any change, I would CC
SELINUX maintainers for advice.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists