[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y8FcImfvUAVa4NoB@gvm01>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 14:26:58 +0100
From: Piergiorgio Beruto <piergiorgio.beruto@...il.com>
To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr, sudheer.mogilappagari@...el.com,
sbhatta@...vell.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
wangjie125@...wei.com, corbet@....net, lkp@...el.com,
gal@...dia.com, gustavoars@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/1] plca.c: fix obvious mistake in checking
retval
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 03:23:17PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 04:56:11PM +0100, Piergiorgio Beruto wrote:
> > This patch addresses a wrong fix that was done during the review
> > process. The intention was to substitute "if(ret < 0)" with
> > "if(ret)". Unfortunately, in this specific file the intended fix did not
> > meet the code. After additional review, it seems like if(ret < 0) was
> > actually the right thing to do. So this patch reverts those changes.
>
> Try to reword the patch description without writing "This patch does foo"
> (prefer imperative mood over descriptive one).
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Fixed. Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists