[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iJajiWoi4qv6=VvcrgBFhRHFbc7Dy7Mbic+j=gBsWgt3g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 14:32:01 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Piergiorgio Beruto <piergiorgio.beruto@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr, sudheer.mogilappagari@...el.com,
sbhatta@...vell.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
wangjie125@...wei.com, corbet@....net, lkp@...el.com,
gal@...dia.com, gustavoars@...nel.org, bagasdotme@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 1/1] plca.c: fix obvious mistake in checking retval
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 2:26 PM Piergiorgio Beruto
<piergiorgio.beruto@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Revert a wrong fix that was done during the review process. The
> intention was to substitute "if(ret < 0)" with "if(ret)".
> Unfortunately, the intended fix did not meet the code.
> Besides, after additional review, it was decided that "if(ret < 0)"
> was actually the right thing to do.
>
> Fixes: 8580e16c28f3 ("net/ethtool: add netlink interface for the PLCA RS")
> Signed-off-by: Piergiorgio Beruto <piergiorgio.beruto@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists