netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: Document common device controller bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 27 Jan 2023 17:49:13 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Gatien Chevallier <gatien.chevallier@...s.st.com>,
        Oleksii_Moisieiev@...m.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, vkoul@...nel.org, jic23@...nel.org,
        olivier.moysan@...s.st.com, arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com,
        mchehab@...nel.org, fabrice.gasnier@...s.st.com,
        ulf.hansson@...aro.org, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com
Cc:     linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: Document common device controller
 bindings

On 27/01/2023 17:40, Gatien Chevallier wrote:
> From: Oleksii Moisieiev <Oleksii_Moisieiev@...m.com>
> 
> Introducing of the common device controller bindings for the controller
> provider and consumer devices. Those bindings are intended to allow
> divided system on chip into muliple domains, that can be used to
> configure hardware permissions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleksii Moisieiev <oleksii_moisieiev@...m.com>
> ---
> 
> No change since V1. I'm letting this patch for dependency with bindings to
> avoid noise with dt/bindings checks. Therefore, it should be reviewed on the
> appropriate thread.

There was a v6 already, this is v3 and I don't understand this comment.
What do you let? Whom? If it is not for review and not for merging,
please annotate it in the title ([IGNORE PATCH] or something).

Best regards,
Krzysztof