[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <179fe90c-0ac9-bb43-6e49-8b1d7ec520df@foss.st.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 18:00:39 +0100
From: Gatien CHEVALLIER <gatien.chevallier@...s.st.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
<Oleksii_Moisieiev@...m.com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
<alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, <vkoul@...nel.org>,
<jic23@...nel.org>, <olivier.moysan@...s.st.com>,
<arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>, <mchehab@...nel.org>,
<fabrice.gasnier@...s.st.com>, <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: Document common device controller
bindings
Hello Krzysztof,
On 1/27/23 17:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 27/01/2023 17:40, Gatien Chevallier wrote:
>> From: Oleksii Moisieiev <Oleksii_Moisieiev@...m.com>
>>
>> Introducing of the common device controller bindings for the controller
>> provider and consumer devices. Those bindings are intended to allow
>> divided system on chip into muliple domains, that can be used to
>> configure hardware permissions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Oleksii Moisieiev <oleksii_moisieiev@...m.com>
>> ---
>>
>> No change since V1. I'm letting this patch for dependency with bindings to
>> avoid noise with dt/bindings checks. Therefore, it should be reviewed on the
>> appropriate thread.
>
> There was a v6 already, this is v3 and I don't understand this comment.
> What do you let? Whom? If it is not for review and not for merging,
> please annotate it in the title ([IGNORE PATCH] or something).
>
Sorry for not being clear in the previous comment.
I meant I'm letting this patch in this patch set so the dependencies on
the feature-domain-controller.yaml file are satisfied.
I will annotate it with [IGNORE PATCH], as you suggest.
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Best regards,
Gatien
Powered by blists - more mailing lists