[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y9gDUi79peQwf1MS@do-x1extreme>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 11:50:10 -0600
From: Seth Forshee <sforshee@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] vhost: improve livepatch switching for heavily
loaded vhost worker kthreads
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 01:40:18PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Both ways this seems to make KLP 'depend' (or at least work lots better)
> when PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y. Do we want a PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=n fallback for
> _cond_resched() too?
I would like this, as we have no other need for PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y and
currently have it disabled.
Thanks,
Seth
Powered by blists - more mailing lists