netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH] octeontx2-af: Removed unnecessary debug messages.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 30 Jan 2023 11:55:45 +0200
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@...vell.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, sgoutham@...vell.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] octeontx2-af: Removed unnecessary debug
 messages.

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 09:25:56AM +0530, Ratheesh Kannoth wrote:
> From: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>
> 
> NPC exact match feature is supported only on one silicon
> variant, removed debug messages which print that this
> feature is not available on all other silicon variants.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@...vell.com>
> ---
>  .../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_hash.c | 12 ++----------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_hash.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_hash.c
> index f69102d20c90..ad1374a12a40 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_hash.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_hash.c
> @@ -200,10 +200,8 @@ void npc_config_secret_key(struct rvu *rvu, int blkaddr)
>  	struct rvu_hwinfo *hw = rvu->hw;
>  	u8 intf;
>  
> -	if (!hwcap->npc_hash_extract) {
> -		dev_info(rvu->dev, "HW does not support secret key configuration\n");
> +	if (!hwcap->npc_hash_extract)
>  		return;
> -	}
>  
>  	for (intf = 0; intf < hw->npc_intfs; intf++) {
>  		rvu_write64(rvu, blkaddr, NPC_AF_INTFX_SECRET_KEY0(intf),
> @@ -221,10 +219,8 @@ void npc_program_mkex_hash(struct rvu *rvu, int blkaddr)
>  	struct rvu_hwinfo *hw = rvu->hw;
>  	u8 intf;
>  
> -	if (!hwcap->npc_hash_extract) {
> -		dev_dbg(rvu->dev, "Field hash extract feature is not supported\n");
> +	if (!hwcap->npc_hash_extract)
>  		return;
> -	}
>  
>  	for (intf = 0; intf < hw->npc_intfs; intf++) {
>  		npc_program_mkex_hash_rx(rvu, blkaddr, intf);
> @@ -1854,16 +1850,12 @@ int rvu_npc_exact_init(struct rvu *rvu)
>  	/* Check exact match feature is supported */
>  	npc_const3 = rvu_read64(rvu, blkaddr, NPC_AF_CONST3);
>  	if (!(npc_const3 & BIT_ULL(62))) {
> -		dev_info(rvu->dev, "%s: No support for exact match support\n",
> -			 __func__);
>  		return 0;
>  	}

You should remove () brackets here too.

>  
>  	/* Check if kex profile has enabled EXACT match nibble */
>  	cfg = rvu_read64(rvu, blkaddr, NPC_AF_INTFX_KEX_CFG(NIX_INTF_RX));
>  	if (!(cfg & NPC_EXACT_NIBBLE_HIT)) {
> -		dev_info(rvu->dev, "%s: NPC exact match nibble not enabled in KEX profile\n",
> -			 __func__);
>  		return 0;
>  	}

Same comment.

>  
> -- 
> 2.25.1
>