[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <MWHPR1801MB1918AEE92F5D6FEC4D19F923D3D09@MWHPR1801MB1918.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 07:11:10 +0000
From: Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@...vell.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [net-next PATCH] octeontx2-af: Removed unnecessary
debug messages.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 09:25:56AM +0530, Ratheesh Kannoth wrote:
> From: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>
>
> NPC exact match feature is supported only on one silicon variant,
> removed debug messages which print that this feature is not available
> on all other silicon variants.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@...vell.com>
> ---
> .../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_hash.c | 12
> ++----------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_hash.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_hash.c
> index f69102d20c90..ad1374a12a40 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_hash.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_hash.c
> @@ -200,10 +200,8 @@ void npc_config_secret_key(struct rvu *rvu, int blkaddr)
> struct rvu_hwinfo *hw = rvu->hw;
> u8 intf;
>
> - if (!hwcap->npc_hash_extract) {
> - dev_info(rvu->dev, "HW does not support secret key configuration\n");
> + if (!hwcap->npc_hash_extract)
> return;
> - }
>
> for (intf = 0; intf < hw->npc_intfs; intf++) {
> rvu_write64(rvu, blkaddr, NPC_AF_INTFX_SECRET_KEY0(intf), @@
> -221,10 +219,8 @@ void npc_program_mkex_hash(struct rvu *rvu, int blkaddr)
> struct rvu_hwinfo *hw = rvu->hw;
> u8 intf;
>
> - if (!hwcap->npc_hash_extract) {
> - dev_dbg(rvu->dev, "Field hash extract feature is not supported\n");
> + if (!hwcap->npc_hash_extract)
> return;
> - }
>
> for (intf = 0; intf < hw->npc_intfs; intf++) {
> npc_program_mkex_hash_rx(rvu, blkaddr, intf); @@ -1854,16 +1850,12
> @@ int rvu_npc_exact_init(struct rvu *rvu)
> /* Check exact match feature is supported */
> npc_const3 = rvu_read64(rvu, blkaddr, NPC_AF_CONST3);
> if (!(npc_const3 & BIT_ULL(62))) {
> - dev_info(rvu->dev, "%s: No support for exact match support\n",
> - __func__);
> return 0;
> }
>You should remove () brackets here too.
Ratheesh -> Sorry , I did not get you. We have more than one statement in this "if" loop. How can we remove brackets ?
>
> /* Check if kex profile has enabled EXACT match nibble */
> cfg = rvu_read64(rvu, blkaddr, NPC_AF_INTFX_KEX_CFG(NIX_INTF_RX));
> if (!(cfg & NPC_EXACT_NIBBLE_HIT)) {
> - dev_info(rvu->dev, "%s: NPC exact match nibble not enabled in KEX profile\n",
> - __func__);
> return 0;
> }
>Same comment.
Ratheesh -> same comment.
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists