[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y9jdTjV1MwOQrBkC@unreal>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 11:20:14 +0200
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@...vell.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [net-next PATCH] octeontx2-af: Removed unnecessary
debug messages.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 07:11:10AM +0000, Ratheesh Kannoth wrote:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 09:25:56AM +0530, Ratheesh Kannoth wrote:
> > From: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>
> >
> > NPC exact match feature is supported only on one silicon variant,
> > removed debug messages which print that this feature is not available
> > on all other silicon variants.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@...vell.com>
> > ---
> > .../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_hash.c | 12
> > ++----------
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_hash.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_hash.c
> > index f69102d20c90..ad1374a12a40 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_hash.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_hash.c
> > @@ -200,10 +200,8 @@ void npc_config_secret_key(struct rvu *rvu, int blkaddr)
> > struct rvu_hwinfo *hw = rvu->hw;
> > u8 intf;
> >
> > - if (!hwcap->npc_hash_extract) {
> > - dev_info(rvu->dev, "HW does not support secret key configuration\n");
> > + if (!hwcap->npc_hash_extract)
> > return;
> > - }
> >
> > for (intf = 0; intf < hw->npc_intfs; intf++) {
> > rvu_write64(rvu, blkaddr, NPC_AF_INTFX_SECRET_KEY0(intf), @@
> > -221,10 +219,8 @@ void npc_program_mkex_hash(struct rvu *rvu, int blkaddr)
> > struct rvu_hwinfo *hw = rvu->hw;
> > u8 intf;
> >
> > - if (!hwcap->npc_hash_extract) {
> > - dev_dbg(rvu->dev, "Field hash extract feature is not supported\n");
> > + if (!hwcap->npc_hash_extract)
> > return;
> > - }
> >
> > for (intf = 0; intf < hw->npc_intfs; intf++) {
> > npc_program_mkex_hash_rx(rvu, blkaddr, intf); @@ -1854,16 +1850,12
> > @@ int rvu_npc_exact_init(struct rvu *rvu)
> > /* Check exact match feature is supported */
> > npc_const3 = rvu_read64(rvu, blkaddr, NPC_AF_CONST3);
> > if (!(npc_const3 & BIT_ULL(62))) {
> > - dev_info(rvu->dev, "%s: No support for exact match support\n",
> > - __func__);
> > return 0;
> > }
>
> >You should remove () brackets here too.
> Ratheesh -> Sorry , I did not get you. We have more than one statement in this "if" loop. How can we remove brackets ?
Please configure your email client to respect reply format.
Probably my typo mislead you, you need to remove {} brackets.
Before your change
if (!(npc_const3 & BIT_ULL(62))) {
dev_info(rvu->dev, "%s: No support for exact match support\n",
__func__);
return 0;
}
After your change:
if (!(npc_const3 & BIT_ULL(62))) {
return 0;
}
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists