netdev - Re: [PATCH v11 04/25] Documentation: document netlink ULP_DDP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230203194131.52b8c904@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 3 Feb 2023 19:41:31 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Aurelien Aptel <aaptel@...dia.com>
Cc:     linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        sagi@...mberg.me, hch@....de, kbusch@...nel.org, axboe@...com,
        chaitanyak@...dia.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        aurelien.aptel@...il.com, smalin@...dia.com, malin1024@...il.com,
        ogerlitz@...dia.com, yorayz@...dia.com, borisp@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 04/25] Documentation: document netlink
 ULP_DDP_GET/SET messages

On Fri,  3 Feb 2023 15:26:44 +0200 Aurelien Aptel wrote:
> +      do: &ulp-ddp-get-op
> +        request:
> +          value: 44
> +          attributes:
> +            - header
> +        reply:
> +          value: 44
> +          attributes:
> +            - header
> +            - hw
> +            - active
> +            - stats
> +      dump: *ulp-ddp-get-op
> +    -
> +      name: ulp-ddp-set
> +      doc: Set ULP DDP capabilities
> +
> +      attribute-set: ulp-ddp
> +
> +      do:
> +        request:
> +          value: 45
> +          attributes:
> +            - header
> +            - wanted
> +        reply:
> +          value: 45
> +          attributes:
> +            - header
> +            - hw
> +            - active

If you need to respin for other reasons - you can drop the value:
entries here. I had to add it for the previous command because of
the discontinuity in IDs but if you're just adding subsequent entries
- the value being previous + 1 is implied.

Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>