netdev - Re: [PATCH/RFC net-next 1/2] devlink: expose port function commands to assign VFs to multiple netdevs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y+OJVW8f/vL9redb@corigine.com>
Date:   Wed, 8 Feb 2023 12:36:53 +0100
From:   Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
        Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
        Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>,
        Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
        Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
        Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Fei Qin <fei.qin@...igine.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...igine.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC net-next 1/2] devlink: expose port function commands
 to assign VFs to multiple netdevs

On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 01:21:22PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 06:42:27PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Mon,  6 Feb 2023 16:36:02 +0100 Simon Horman wrote:
> > > +VF assignment setup
> > > +---------------------------
> > > +In some cases, NICs could have multiple physical ports per PF. Users can assign VFs to
> > > +different ports.
> > 
> > Please make sure you run make htmldocs when changing docs,
> > this will warn.
> > 
> > > +- Get count of VFs assigned to physical port::
> > > +
> > > +    $ devlink port show pci/0000:82:00.0/0
> > > +    pci/0000:82:00.0/0: type eth netdev enp130s0np0 flavour physical port 0 splittable true lanes 4
> > 
> > Physical port has VFs? My knee jerk reaction is that allocating
> > resources via devlink is fine but this seems to lean a bit into
> > forwarding. How do other vendors do it? What's the mapping of VFs
> > to ports?
> 
> I don't understand the meaning of VFs here. If we are talking about PCI
> VFs, other vendors follow PCI spec "9.3.3.3.1 VF Enable" section, which
> talks about having one bit to enable all VFs at once. All these VFs will
> have separate netdevs.

Yes, that is the case here too (before and after).

What we are talking about is the association of VFs to physical ports
(in the case where a NIC has more than one physical port).