[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <63c6825fc2c94ad19ac7de93a6f151f6@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 14:37:32 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Simon Horman' <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
Alexandra Winter <wintera@...ux.ibm.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Thorsten Winkler <twinkler@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 4/4] s390/qeth: Convert sprintf/snprintf to
scnprintf
From: Simon Horman
> Sent: 07 February 2023 15:43
...
> However, amongst other usages of the return value,
> those callers also check for a return < 0 from this function.
> Can that occur, in the sprintf or scnprintf case?
That rather depends on what happens with calls like:
snprintf(NULL, 0, "*%s%*s", MAX_INT, "", MAX_INT, "");
That is a whole bag of worms you don't want to put your hand into.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists