netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/3] net: dsa: rzn1-a5psw: add vlan support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230208220219.t7nejekbmqu7vv75@skbuf>
Date:   Thu, 9 Feb 2023 00:02:19 +0200
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     Clément Léger <clement.leger@...tlin.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,
        Miquèl Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Milan Stevanovic <milan.stevanovic@...com>,
        Jimmy Lalande <jimmy.lalande@...com>,
        Pascal Eberhard <pascal.eberhard@...com>,
        Arun Ramadoss <Arun.Ramadoss@...rochip.com>,
        linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/3] net: dsa: rzn1-a5psw: add vlan support

On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 09:38:04AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > +	/* Enable TAG always mode for the port, this is actually controlled
> > +	 * by VLAN_IN_MODE_ENA field which will be used for PVID insertion
> > +	 */
> > +	reg = A5PSW_VLAN_IN_MODE_TAG_ALWAYS;
> > +	reg <<= A5PSW_VLAN_IN_MODE_PORT_SHIFT(port);
> > +	a5psw_reg_rmw(a5psw, A5PSW_VLAN_IN_MODE, A5PSW_VLAN_IN_MODE_PORT(port),
> > +		      reg);
> 
> If we always enable VLAN mode, which VLAN ID do switch ports not part of a
> VLAN aware bridge get classified into?

Good question. I'd guess 0, since otherwise, the VLAN-unaware FDB
entries added with a5psw_port_fdb_add() wouldn't work.

But the driver has to survive the following chain of commands, which, by
looking at the current code structure, it doesn't:

ip link add br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 0
ip link set swp0 master br0 # PVID should remain at a value chosen privately by the driver
bridge vlan add dev swp0 vid 100 pvid untagged # PVID should not change in hardware yet
ip link set br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1 # PVID should change to 100 now
ip link set br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 0 # PVID should change to the value chosen by the driver

Essentially, what I'm saying is that VLANs added with "bridge vlan add"
should only be active while vlan_filtering=1.

If you search for "commit_pvid" in drivers/net/dsa, you'll find a number
of drivers which have a more elaborate code structure which allows the
commands above to work properly.