[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6582F9D7-D74B-4A4A-A498-1B3002B9840E@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 08:35:50 +0100
From: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>
To: Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@...il.com>
Cc: pshelar@....org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com,
simon.horman@...igine.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
dev@...nvswitch.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net: openvswitch: fix possible memory leak in
ovs_meter_cmd_set()
On 10 Feb 2023, at 3:05, Hangyu Hua wrote:
> old_meter needs to be free after it is detached regardless of whether
> the new meter is successfully attached.
>
> Fixes: c7c4c44c9a95 ("net: openvswitch: expand the meters supported number")
> Signed-off-by: Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@...il.com>
Thanks for doing a v3. The change looks good to me!
Acked-by: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>
> ---
>
> v2: use goto label and free old_meter outside of ovs lock.
>
> v3: add the label and keep the lock in place.
>
> net/openvswitch/meter.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/openvswitch/meter.c b/net/openvswitch/meter.c
> index 6e38f68f88c2..f2698d2316df 100644
> --- a/net/openvswitch/meter.c
> +++ b/net/openvswitch/meter.c
> @@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ static int ovs_meter_cmd_set(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
>
> err = attach_meter(meter_tbl, meter);
> if (err)
> - goto exit_unlock;
> + goto exit_free_old_meter;
> ovs_unlock();
>
> @@ -472,6 +472,8 @@ static int ovs_meter_cmd_set(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> genlmsg_end(reply, ovs_reply_header);
> return genlmsg_reply(reply, info);
>
> +exit_free_old_meter:
> + ovs_meter_free(old_meter);
> exit_unlock:
> ovs_unlock();
> nlmsg_free(reply);
> --
> 2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists