[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+e4NTGi7VASbm5K@shredder>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2023 17:45:57 +0200
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
razor@...ckwall.org, roopa@...dia.com, petrm@...dia.com,
mlxsw@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] bridge: mcast: Move validation to a policy
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 07:20:57PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 09:18:51 +0200 Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > + if (nla_len(attr) != sizeof(struct br_mdb_entry)) {
> > + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Invalid MDBA_SET_ENTRY attribute length");
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> Well, you're just moving it, but NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR() would be better.
> We shouldn't be adding _MOD() in the core implementation of the family.
Assuming you are referring to this code when it's moved to
net/core/rtnetlink.c, then I already removed the _MOD() suffix from it
(as visible in the RFC). I can squash this as well:
diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
index c9f878a28d32..491e4231b3dd 100644
--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
+++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
@@ -6138,7 +6138,7 @@ static int rtnl_validate_mdb_entry(const struct nlattr *attr,
struct br_mdb_entry *entry = nla_data(attr);
if (nla_len(attr) != sizeof(struct br_mdb_entry)) {
- NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Invalid MDBA_SET_ENTRY attribute length");
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(extack, attr, "Invalid attribute length");
return -EINVAL;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists