netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: default_rps

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230215112954.7990caa5@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:29:54 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: default_rps_mask follow-up

On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 19:33:35 +0100 Paolo Abeni wrote:
> The first patch namespacify the setting: once proper isolation
> is in place in the main namespace, additional demux in the child
> namespaces will be redundant.

Would you mind spelling this out again for me? If I create a veth with
the peer in a netns, the local end will get one RPS mask and the netns
end will get a RPS mask from the netns. If the daemon is not aware of
having to configure RPS masks (which I believe was your use case) then
it won't set the default mask in the netns either.. so we assume veth
is first created and then moved, or we don't use veth, or I'm lost
completely?