[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+01bfkEKwBgu3Gy@x130>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:41:33 -0800
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
To: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>,
Maor Dickman <maord@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 01/15] net/mlx5: Lag, Let user configure multiport
eswitch
On 15 Feb 18:04, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
>Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 13:46:29 +0200
>
>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 06:07:54PM +0100, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>>> From: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
>>> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 14:18:07 -0800
>
>[...]
>
>>> How about
>>>
>>> if (ctx->val.vbool)
>>> return mlx5_lag_mpesw_enable(dev);
>>> else
>>> mlx5_lag_mpesw_disable(dev);
>>>
>>> return 0;
>>
>> If such construction is used, there won't need in "else".
>>
>> if (ctx->val.vbool)
>> return mlx5_lag_mpesw_enable(dev);
>>
>> mlx5_lag_mpesw_disable(dev);
>> return 0;
>
Thanks, this is exactly what I did when posting V2.
>Correct, I just thought that if-else would look more intuitive here
>since it's a simple "if enabled enable else disable".
>
>[...]
>
>Thanks,
>Olek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists