[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230215150540.5441eb8c@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 15:05:40 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: default_rps_mask follow-up
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 21:33:01 +0100 Paolo Abeni wrote:
> That is not needed, as every other devices forwarding packets to the
> netns has proper isolation (RPS or IRQ affinity) already set. If the
> child ns device RPS configuration is left unchanged, the incoming
> packets in the child netns go through an unneeded RPS stage, which
> could be a bad thing if the selected CPU is on a different NUMA node.
I see your point now. Must have been low on coffee in the morning.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists