netdev - Re: [PATCH] sfc: fix builds without CONFIG_RTC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 17 Feb 2023 15:47:15 +0100
From:   Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
To:     <alejandro.lucero-palau@....com>
CC:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-net-drivers@....com>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        <edumazet@...gle.com>, <habetsm.xilinx@...il.com>,
        <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <corbet@....net>, <jiri@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sfc: fix builds without CONFIG_RTC_LIB

From: Lucero Palau, Alejandro <alejandro.lucero-palau@....com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 10:22:36 +0000

> From: Alejandro Lucero <alejandro.lucero-palau@....com>
> 
> Adding an embarrasing missing semicolon precluding kernel building

:D

'Embarrassing' tho, with two 's'. And I guess "embarrassingly missed",
since a semicolon itself can't be "embarrassing" I believe? :D

+ "add", not "adding"
+ "precluding"? You mean "breaking"?

> in ia64 configs.
> 
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202302170047.EjCPizu3-lkp@intel.com/
> Fixes: 14743ddd2495 ("sfc: add devlink info support for ef100")
> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero <alejandro.lucero-palau@....com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_devlink.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_devlink.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_devlink.c
> index d2eb6712ba35..3eb355fd4282 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_devlink.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_devlink.c
> @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ static void efx_devlink_info_running_v2(struct efx_nic *efx,
>  				    GET_VERSION_V2_OUT_SUCFW_BUILD_DATE);
>  		rtc_time64_to_tm(tstamp, &build_date);
>  #else
> -		memset(&build_date, 0, sizeof(build_date)
> +		memset(&build_date, 0, sizeof(build_date);
>  #endif
>  		build_id = MCDI_DWORD(outbuf, GET_VERSION_V2_OUT_SUCFW_CHIP_ID);
>  

Thanks,
Olek