netdev - Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] mac80211_hwsim: add PMSR capability support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 17 Feb 2023 10:19:14 +0100
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:     Jaewan Kim <jaewan@...gle.com>
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com, adelva@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] mac80211_hwsim: add PMSR capability support

On Fri, 2023-02-17 at 14:11 +0900, Jaewan Kim wrote:
> > 
> > > +static const struct nla_policy
> > > +hwsim_ftm_capa_policy[NL80211_PMSR_FTM_CAPA_ATTR_MAX + 1] = {
> > 
> > This feels a bit iffy to have here, but I guess it's better that
> > defining new attributes for all this over and over again.
> 
> I'm sorry but could you rephrase what you expect here?
> Are you suggesting to define new sets of HWSIM_PMSR_* enums
> instead of using existing enums NL80211_PMSR_*?

No, I was just drive-by commenting on this. Given all the options this
feels like it's probably the best one :-)

> BTW,  can I expect you to review my changes for further patchsets?
> I sometimes get conflicting opinions (e.g. line limits)

Sorry about that. See my other mail. I'm happy to accept it as it is.

> so it would be a great help if you take a look at my changes.
> 

I'll be the one applying the patches, so yes.

johannes