[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+9JXU+5QEU1TMdi@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 10:31:09 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: Jaewan Kim <jaewan@...gle.com>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com, adelva@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] mac80211_hwsim: add PMSR capability support
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 10:13:08AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-02-17 at 08:43 +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 02:11:38PM +0900, Jaewan Kim wrote:
> > > BTW, can I expect you to review my changes for further patchsets?
> > > I sometimes get conflicting opinions (e.g. line limits)
> >
> > Sorry, I was the one that said "you can use 100 columns", if that's not
> > ok in the networking subsystem yet, that was my fault as it's been that
> > way in other parts of the kernel tree for a while.
> >
>
> Hah. Maybe that's my mistake then, I was still at "use 80 columns where
> it's simple, and more if it would look worse" ...
It was changed back in 2020:
bdc48fa11e46 ("checkpatch/coding-style: deprecate 80-column warning")
seems to take a while to propagate out to all the subsystems :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists