netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: phy: EEE fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y/SUXDlB6TlBbZMI@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 21 Feb 2023 09:52:28 +0000
From:   "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: phy: EEE fixes

On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 10:48:09AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 09:36:35AM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 06:03:30AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > > changes v2:
> > > - restore previous ethtool set logic for the case where advertisements
> > >   are not provided by user space.
> > 
> > I don't think the _kernel_ should be doing this - this introduces a
> > different behaviour to the kernel. As I already said, setting the
> > default advertisement in the case of ethtool -s is done by userspace
> > not by the kernel.
> > 
> > In fact, the kernel explicitly rejects an attempt to have autoneg
> > enabled with a zero advertising mask:
> > 
> >         linkmode_copy(advertising, cmd->link_modes.advertising);
> >         linkmode_and(advertising, advertising, phydev->supported);
> >         if (autoneg == AUTONEG_ENABLE && linkmode_empty(advertising))
> >                 return -EINVAL;
> > 
> > and I think we should have a uniform behaviour with the same API,
> > rather than different behaviours, as that becomes quite messy.
> 
> I decided to revert this part to not mix different issue. This logic
> existed before my refactoring. So, it is better to handle it as
> different patch. Current patch set should address only regressions.

Okay, let's keep it like that then. Thanks.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!