lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230226085120.3907863-4-joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 26 Feb 2023 00:51:13 -0800
From:   Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@...il.com>
To:     bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     martin.lau@...nel.org, andrii@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org,
        memxor@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        toke@...nel.org, Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v12 bpf-next 03/10] bpf: Allow initializing dynptrs in kfuncs

This change allows kfuncs to take in an uninitialized dynptr as a
parameter. Before this change, only helper functions could successfully
use uninitialized dynptrs. This change moves the memory access check
(including stack state growing and slot marking) into
process_dynptr_func(), which both helpers and kfuncs call into.

Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@...il.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 67 ++++++++++++++-----------------------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index baecccc5fa7a..a4cca21aefc3 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -268,7 +268,6 @@ struct bpf_call_arg_meta {
 	u32 ret_btf_id;
 	u32 subprogno;
 	struct btf_field *kptr_field;
-	u8 uninit_dynptr_regno;
 };
 
 struct btf *btf_vmlinux;
@@ -6225,10 +6224,11 @@ static int process_kptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno,
  * Helpers which do not mutate the bpf_dynptr set MEM_RDONLY in their argument
  * type, and declare it as 'const struct bpf_dynptr *' in their prototype.
  */
-int process_dynptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno,
-			enum bpf_arg_type arg_type, struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta)
+int process_dynptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, int insn_idx,
+			enum bpf_arg_type arg_type)
 {
 	struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env), *reg = &regs[regno];
+	int err;
 
 	/* MEM_UNINIT and MEM_RDONLY are exclusive, when applied to an
 	 * ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR (or ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR | DYNPTR_TYPE_*):
@@ -6254,23 +6254,23 @@ int process_dynptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno,
 	 *		 to.
 	 */
 	if (arg_type & MEM_UNINIT) {
+		int i;
+
 		if (!is_dynptr_reg_valid_uninit(env, reg)) {
 			verbose(env, "Dynptr has to be an uninitialized dynptr\n");
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 
-		/* We only support one dynptr being uninitialized at the moment,
-		 * which is sufficient for the helper functions we have right now.
-		 */
-		if (meta->uninit_dynptr_regno) {
-			verbose(env, "verifier internal error: multiple uninitialized dynptr args\n");
-			return -EFAULT;
+		/* we write BPF_DW bits (8 bytes) at a time */
+		for (i = 0; i < BPF_DYNPTR_SIZE; i += 8) {
+			err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, regno,
+					       i, BPF_DW, BPF_WRITE, -1, false);
+			if (err)
+				return err;
 		}
 
-		meta->uninit_dynptr_regno = regno;
+		err = mark_stack_slots_dynptr(env, reg, arg_type, insn_idx);
 	} else /* MEM_RDONLY and None case from above */ {
-		int err;
-
 		/* For the reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK case, bpf_dynptr is never const */
 		if (reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR && !(arg_type & MEM_RDONLY)) {
 			verbose(env, "cannot pass pointer to const bpf_dynptr, the helper mutates it\n");
@@ -6306,10 +6306,8 @@ int process_dynptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno,
 		}
 
 		err = mark_dynptr_read(env, reg);
-		if (err)
-			return err;
 	}
-	return 0;
+	return err;
 }
 
 static bool arg_type_is_mem_size(enum bpf_arg_type type)
@@ -6719,7 +6717,8 @@ static int dynptr_ref_obj_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state
 
 static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 arg,
 			  struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta,
-			  const struct bpf_func_proto *fn)
+			  const struct bpf_func_proto *fn,
+			  int insn_idx)
 {
 	u32 regno = BPF_REG_1 + arg;
 	struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env), *reg = &regs[regno];
@@ -6932,7 +6931,7 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 arg,
 		err = check_mem_size_reg(env, reg, regno, true, meta);
 		break;
 	case ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR:
-		err = process_dynptr_func(env, regno, arg_type, meta);
+		err = process_dynptr_func(env, regno, insn_idx, arg_type);
 		if (err)
 			return err;
 		break;
@@ -8218,7 +8217,7 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
 	meta.func_id = func_id;
 	/* check args */
 	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_FUNC_REG_ARGS; i++) {
-		err = check_func_arg(env, i, &meta, fn);
+		err = check_func_arg(env, i, &meta, fn, insn_idx);
 		if (err)
 			return err;
 	}
@@ -8243,30 +8242,6 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
 
 	regs = cur_regs(env);
 
-	/* This can only be set for PTR_TO_STACK, as CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR cannot
-	 * be reinitialized by any dynptr helper. Hence, mark_stack_slots_dynptr
-	 * is safe to do directly.
-	 */
-	if (meta.uninit_dynptr_regno) {
-		if (regs[meta.uninit_dynptr_regno].type == CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR) {
-			verbose(env, "verifier internal error: CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR cannot be initialized\n");
-			return -EFAULT;
-		}
-		/* we write BPF_DW bits (8 bytes) at a time */
-		for (i = 0; i < BPF_DYNPTR_SIZE; i += 8) {
-			err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, meta.uninit_dynptr_regno,
-					       i, BPF_DW, BPF_WRITE, -1, false);
-			if (err)
-				return err;
-		}
-
-		err = mark_stack_slots_dynptr(env, &regs[meta.uninit_dynptr_regno],
-					      fn->arg_type[meta.uninit_dynptr_regno - BPF_REG_1],
-					      insn_idx);
-		if (err)
-			return err;
-	}
-
 	if (meta.release_regno) {
 		err = -EINVAL;
 		/* This can only be set for PTR_TO_STACK, as CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR cannot
@@ -9475,7 +9450,8 @@ static int process_kf_arg_ptr_to_rbtree_node(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 						  &meta->arg_rbtree_root.field);
 }
 
-static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta)
+static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta,
+			    int insn_idx)
 {
 	const char *func_name = meta->func_name, *ref_tname;
 	const struct btf *btf = meta->btf;
@@ -9672,7 +9648,8 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_
 				return -EINVAL;
 			}
 
-			ret = process_dynptr_func(env, regno, ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR | MEM_RDONLY, NULL);
+			ret = process_dynptr_func(env, regno, insn_idx,
+						  ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR | MEM_RDONLY);
 			if (ret < 0)
 				return ret;
 			break;
@@ -9880,7 +9857,7 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
 	}
 
 	/* Check the arguments */
-	err = check_kfunc_args(env, &meta);
+	err = check_kfunc_args(env, &meta, insn_idx);
 	if (err < 0)
 		return err;
 	/* In case of release function, we get register number of refcounted
-- 
2.34.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ