netdev - [PATCH v12 bpf-next 01/10] bpf: Support "sk_buff" and "xdp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230226085120.3907863-2-joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 26 Feb 2023 00:51:11 -0800
From:   Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@...il.com>
To:     bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     martin.lau@...nel.org, andrii@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org,
        memxor@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        toke@...nel.org, Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v12 bpf-next 01/10] bpf: Support "sk_buff" and "xdp_buff" as valid kfunc arg types

The bpf mirror of the in-kernel sk_buff and xdp_buff data structures are
__sk_buff and xdp_md. Currently, when we pass in the program ctx to a
kfunc where the program ctx is a skb or xdp buffer, we reject the
program if the in-kernel definition is sk_buff/xdp_buff instead of
__sk_buff/xdp_md.

This change allows "sk_buff <--> __sk_buff" and "xdp_buff <--> xdp_md"
to be recognized as valid matches. The user program may pass in their
program ctx as a __sk_buff or xdp_md, and the in-kernel definition
of the kfunc may define this arg as a sk_buff or xdp_buff.

Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@...il.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/btf.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index fa22ec79ac0e..84cca8473873 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -5683,6 +5683,10 @@ btf_get_prog_ctx_type(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, const struct btf *btf,
 	 * int socket_filter_bpf_prog(struct __sk_buff *skb)
 	 * { // no fields of skb are ever used }
 	 */
+	if (strcmp(ctx_tname, "__sk_buff") == 0 && strcmp(tname, "sk_buff") == 0)
+		return ctx_type;
+	if (strcmp(ctx_tname, "xdp_md") == 0 && strcmp(tname, "xdp_buff") == 0)
+		return ctx_type;
 	if (strcmp(ctx_tname, tname)) {
 		/* bpf_user_pt_regs_t is a typedef, so resolve it to
 		 * underlying struct and check name again
-- 
2.34.1