lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAM0EoMmx7As2RL4hnuH8ja_B7Dpx86DWL3JmPQKjB+2B+XYQww@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 14:51:58 -0500 From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> Cc: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>, Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...atatu.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, amir@...ai.me, dcaratti@...hat.com, willemb@...gle.com, ozsh@...dia.com, paulb@...dia.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/3] net/sched: act_pedit: fix action bind logic On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 2:36 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote: > > On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 17:15:00 +0100 Simon Horman wrote: > > > > OTOH, perhaps it's a regression wrt the oldest of > > > > the two patches references below. > > > > > > ...because filters and actions are completely separate TC objects. > > > There shouldn't be actions that can be created independently but can't be > > > really used. > > > > I agree that shouldn't be the case. > > For me that doesn't make it a bug, but I don't feel strongly about it. > > I'm with Simon - this is a long standing problem, and we weren't getting > any user complaints about this. So I also prefer to route this via > net-next, without the Fixes tags. At minimum the pedit is a fix. The rest is toss-a-coin and put in net-next or net. cheers, jamal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists