netdev - Re: [PATCH net 1/3] net/sched: act_pedit: fix action bind logic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230227120420.152a9b32@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 27 Feb 2023 12:04:20 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc:     Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
        Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...atatu.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us, davem@...emloft.net,
        edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, amir@...ai.me,
        dcaratti@...hat.com, willemb@...gle.com, ozsh@...dia.com,
        paulb@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/3] net/sched: act_pedit: fix action bind logic

On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 14:51:58 -0500 Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> > > I agree that shouldn't be the case.
> > > For me that doesn't make it a bug, but I don't feel strongly about it.  
> >
> > I'm with Simon - this is a long standing problem, and we weren't getting
> > any user complaints about this. So I also prefer to route this via
> > net-next, without the Fixes tags.  
> 
> At minimum the pedit is a fix.

How come? What makes pedit different?
It's kinda hard to parse from the diff and the commit messages
look copy/pasted.

> The rest is toss-a-coin and put in net-next or net.