netdev - Re: [PATCH net 1/3] net/sched: act_pedit: fix action bind logic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230227134137.51079d41@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 27 Feb 2023 13:41:37 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc:     Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
        Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...atatu.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us, davem@...emloft.net,
        edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, amir@...ai.me,
        dcaratti@...hat.com, willemb@...gle.com, ozsh@...dia.com,
        paulb@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/3] net/sched: act_pedit: fix action bind logic

On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 12:04:20 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > I'm with Simon - this is a long standing problem, and we weren't getting
> > > any user complaints about this. So I also prefer to route this via
> > > net-next, without the Fixes tags.    
> > 
> > At minimum the pedit is a fix.  
> 
> How come? What makes pedit different?
> It's kinda hard to parse from the diff and the commit messages
> look copy/pasted.

Ah, looks like DaveM already applied this (not v2), so the discussion
is moot.