lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 3 Mar 2023 19:00:45 +0800 (CST)
From:   <yang.yang29@....com.cn>
To:     <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
        <pabeni@...hat.com>, <shuah@...nel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <zhang.yunkai@....com.cn>, <xu.xin16@....com.cn>,
        <jiang.xuexin@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next v2] selftests: net: udpgso_bench_tx: Add test for IP fragmentation of UDP packets

> Did you actually observe a difference in behavior with this change?

The test of UDP only cares about sending, and does not much need to
consider the problem of PMTU, we configure it to IP_PMTUDISC_DONT.
    IP_PMTUDISC_DONT: turn off pmtu detection.
    IP_PMTUDISC_OMIT: the same as DONT, but in some scenarios, DF will
be ignored. I did not construct such a scene, presumably when forwarding.
Any way, in this test, is the same as DONT.

We have a question, what is the point of this test if it is not compared to
UDP GSO and IP fragmentation. No user or tool will segment in user mode,
UDP GSO should compare performance with IP fragmentation.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ