netdev - Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: net: Add ICSSG Ethernet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 Mar 2023 09:58:00 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Md Danish Anwar <a0501179@...com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@...com>
Cc:     "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@...com>, Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>,
        Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>,
        YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, andrew@...n.ch, nm@...com,
        ssantosh@...nel.org, srk@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: net: Add ICSSG
 Ethernet

On 07/03/2023 05:57, Md Danish Anwar wrote:
>>> +allOf:
>>> +  - $ref: /schemas/remoteproc/ti,pru-consumer.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> +  compatible:
>>> +    enum:
>>> +      - ti,am654-icssg-prueth  # for AM65x SoC family
>>> +
>>> +  ti,sram:
>>> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
>>> +    description:
>>> +      phandle to MSMC SRAM node
>>
>> I believe we have a standard 'sram' property to point to SRAM nodes 
>> assuming this is just mmio-sram or similar.
>>
> 
> Yes, we have standard 'sram' property but Krzysztof had asked me to make the
> sram property vendor specific in last revision of this series.

Sorry about that. I missed that we already have a 'sram'. The question
remains whether this is a phandle to MMIO SRAM or similar (sram.yaml).

Best regards,
Krzysztof