netdev - Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: net: Add ICSSG Ethernet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 9 Mar 2023 17:14:41 +0530
From:   Md Danish Anwar <a0501179@...com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@...com>
CC:     "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@...com>, Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>,
        Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>,
        YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, <andrew@...n.ch>,
        <nm@...com>, <ssantosh@...nel.org>, <srk@...com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: net: Add ICSSG
 Ethernet

Hi Krzysztof,

On 07/03/23 14:28, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 07/03/2023 05:57, Md Danish Anwar wrote:
>>>> +allOf:
>>>> +  - $ref: /schemas/remoteproc/ti,pru-consumer.yaml#
>>>> +
>>>> +properties:
>>>> +  compatible:
>>>> +    enum:
>>>> +      - ti,am654-icssg-prueth  # for AM65x SoC family
>>>> +
>>>> +  ti,sram:
>>>> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
>>>> +    description:
>>>> +      phandle to MSMC SRAM node
>>>
>>> I believe we have a standard 'sram' property to point to SRAM nodes 
>>> assuming this is just mmio-sram or similar.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, we have standard 'sram' property but Krzysztof had asked me to make the
>> sram property vendor specific in last revision of this series.
> 
> Sorry about that. I missed that we already have a 'sram'. The question
> remains whether this is a phandle to MMIO SRAM or similar (sram.yaml).
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

The SRAM that we are using here is phandle to MMIO-SRAM only. In the example
section you can see, sram node points to msmc_ram (ti,sram = <&msmc_ram>;) And
msmc_ram has compatible as "mmio-sram" in k3-am65-main.dtsi [1].

	msmc_ram: sram@...00000 {
		compatible = "mmio-sram";
		reg = <0x0 0x70000000 0x0 0x200000>;

So I can use 'sram' property as there is no need to make this as ti specific.
Let me know if it seems good to you.

[1]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi?h=v6.3-rc1#n11

-- 
Thanks and Regards,
Danish.